AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Lauren Eastland

ANTH002 · ANTH006 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless and can handle a heavy, unforgiving online workload with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOverwhelming ReadingHour-Long LecturesTough GraderDisorganized DeadlinesRude Communication
  • Nearly every review rates quality 1-2 and .
  • Workload centers on massive , and weekly quizzes.
  • Students repeatedly cite late modules, , and harsh or rude interactions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A few students still earn As or A+s, but only through huge .

Both online and ; most sample is online.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Students describe extreme reading volume, multi-hour lectures, and .

Online volume dominates; in-person reviews agree the class is very hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

and require lecture watching; others say no, so policy is inconsistent.

and optional attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

and a wall of , and waste-of-time language across almost all reviews.

Online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Tough grader tags dominate; students report , and alleged AI use.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Weekly readings, long lectures, papers, and quizzes regularly described as more work than several other classes combined.

Format shift

Online is the main source of overload evidence.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students call lectures boring, rambling, and and .

Format shift

Online reviews are the bulk of the negative teaching evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and weekly modules more than a single big exam format.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize papers and quizzes; in-person reviews agree.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The two in-person reviews match the online pattern: , and disorganized due dates.

Main concern

Same overload and disorganization reported online.

What students said

“DO NOT waste your time listening to her video lectures. She is very verbose with .”
ANTH002
“Definitely the hardest class I've taken at Solano. There is so ”
002

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

crushing reading, , and slow or .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ . The professor is very rude and does not respect her students.”
ANTH006
“This one class takes more of my time weekly than my other 3 classes combined.”
ANTH002
“She posts the modules late, has secret due times hidden in her syllabus”
ANTH002

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper and quiz heavy with strict rules; reviews do not clearly prove webcam proctoring.

Weekly quizzesLong required lecturesStrict paper citationsHeavy reading

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments also emphasize weekly quizzes and .

Weekly quizzesHeavy readingLong lectures
“ , and other assignments.”
002

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, required long lectures, and .

Weekly quizzesRequired lecture videosStrict paper rules
“Her lectures/quizes are the waste of time, cuz you need to read bunch of books and watch long videos.”
ANTH002
“She is very strict with this; she checks if you have the correct minutes or page in your citation.”
ANTH002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There is a reason that Eastland has extremely low ratings at every single college she teaches at.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews (13 online, 2 in person) with unusually consistent negative themes. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Overload

10/100

“This one class takes more of my time weekly than my other 3 classes combined.”

🚫 Recommendation Collapse

8/100

“ .”

🧭

15/100

“She posts the modules late, has secret due times hidden in her syllabus”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are hours long and .
  • She is very verbose with .
  • She's extremely rude

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I was marked down for not giving enough detail and got a D.
  • She is failing people saying they use AI but it's not true
  • My grade however shows that I didn't learn a thing

Theme 3

📄 About Workload

  • So .
  • Insane amounts coursework weekly
  • There is so

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen recent, highly consistent negative reviews with concrete workload and .

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 56
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ANTH00210 reviews
0022 reviews
ANTH0062 reviews
0241 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 5