AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Alonso Duarte

ACCT10015 · ACCT001 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

if you will put in steady work, chase grade fixes, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderHeavy homework loadOpen-note testsHands-on projectsInconsistent teaching
  • Accounting is hard and and time-consuming.
  • Students who communicate, ask questions, and use redos/open notes can recover grades.
  • and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As are possible with redos, open notes, and outreach, but , and many still struggle.

In-person reviews stress redos and open-note tests; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Intro accounting is treated as hard, fast, and .

Both formats call the material hard; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

couple online notes saying no.

; online is mixed and sparse.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; fans praise help and structure while critics say he cannot teach clearly.

Online reviews are more polarized; early F grades.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

, but redos, open notes, and grade appeals can soften outcomes if you advocate.

Format shift

In person mentions redos and open notes; .

Workload

Heavy

26/100

, and reports of 10-15 hours a week make the load heavy.

Format shift

Online projects drive the highest hour counts; in and tests.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Students and weak that force peer teaching.

Format shift

; in person complaints center on lecture quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and hefty tests rather than one single format.

Format shift

Online leans project-heavy; in .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person classes have mandatory , and mixed lecture quality, with open-note tests and redo chances for those who push.

Main concern

Lectures often feel unhelpful while tests and .

What students said

“The lectures are a waste of time. Had a lecture for three hours, would be put into groups to work on it mostly everyone was lost.”
ACCT001
“2 hefty tests that . Even rounded my final grade up.”
ACCT001
“He lets you redo the exams and HW to give you a chance to be better.”
ACCT001

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections range from highly organized and hours.

Main concern

and eat 10-15+ hours weekly with .

What students said

“ . He provides very helpful presentation material at the start of each chapter.”
ACCT001
“It took sometimes 10+ hours a week but I actually learned something.”
ACCT001
“Instead of directions and the professor did not provide enough resources.”
ACCT10015

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; online sections may replace tests with heavy projects.

Open-note testsExam redosCanvas automated gradingProject-based assessments

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report open-note tests, redo opportunities, and .

Open-note testsExam redosCanvas automated grading
“2 hefty tests that .”
ACCT001
“He lets you redo the exams and HW to give you a chance to be better.”
ACCT001
“There have been so many problems that I've gotten correct that were marked as WRONG on the tests.”
ACCT001

Online

Online comments focus more on weekly projects than proctored exams, with .

Project-based assessmentsHeavy weekly work
“Instead of directions and the professor did not provide enough resources.”
ACCT10015
“The course has weekly projects where you run the accounting work for a business.”
ACCT001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you put in the work you'll be fine. Don't be afraid to ask questions. He truly wants you to succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews spanning 2021-2025, balancing online project complaints with in-person redo and open-note comments. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Heavy Workload

26/100

“I spent at least 15 hours on his class weekly.”

📝

62/100

“2 hefty tests that . Even rounded my final grade up.”

🎯 Polarized Teaching

48/100

“He's a .”

👍

52/100

“ and honestly im not the smartest cookie.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures are a waste of time.
  • He provides very helpful presentation material at the start of each chapter.
  • Unable to teach students at different levels.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very difficult class for intro.
  • He lets you redo the exams and HW.
  • .

Theme 3

⏱️ About Workload

  • Also the .
  • It took sometimes 10+ hours a week.
  • beware there is a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen recent reviews across online and in person with detailed comments and consistent themes on difficulty and mixed teaching.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ACCT00111 reviews
ACCT100153 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1