AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Divyangi Shukla

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

if any .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAwful teachingMean and rudeNo useful feedbackTough graderDo not take
  • Both reviews rate quality 1 and call her one of the .
  • Students say she teaches nothing useful and gives mean, non-actionable criticism.
  • and tough grading without learning payoff make this a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Both students earned Bs under tough grading with no sense that effort reliably unlocks an A.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Students rate difficulty 5 and say the class wastes time without teaching usable art skills.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Both reviews mark attendance mandatory for a class they found unhelpful.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Both students urge taking anyone else and report zero desire to continue.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and non-constructive dislike of student work.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Reviews focus more , so .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students say she teaches nothing, is rude, and leaves learners stuck without guidance.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments emphasize critique and participation more than exams, but assessment mix is not detailed.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Two recent in-person reviews describe zero useful instruction, rude tone, and .

Main concern

Mean critique without teaching or constructive guidance.

What students said

“this is the .”
80920
“She is mean and rude. She does not give any sort of ”
80920

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; complaints focus on harsh studio critique instead.

Participation mattersStudio critique

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; feedback centers on harsh in-class critique.

Harsh critiqueParticipation matters
“she just says she doesn't like what you are doing and leaves it up to us to figure out”
80920

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If so.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting unanimous negative teaching and feedback. Credibility rating: Low.

💀 Teaching Disaster

12/100

“this is the .”

🚫 Zero Recommendation

8/100

“If you want .”

🗯️

18/100

“She does not give any sort of ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Quality

  • teaches nothing. Do not waste your time
  • This has been one of the .

Theme 2

💬

  • She is mean and rude.
  • she just says she doesn't like what you are doing and leaves it up to us to figure out

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two very recent negative reviews with strong agreement but tiny sample size keep credibility low.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

809202 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values