AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Nicole Wilson

ANT002 · ANTHRO3 · ANTH002 · ANTHR002 · ANTH001 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
52.63%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Only take her if you need the class and will study hard; if .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy readingSlow communicationExtra credit heavyTest heavy
  • Content can be interesting, but and picky plagiarism standards frustrate many.
  • Heavy weekly reading, discussions, and exams; communication and .
  • Doable for and use study guides.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As appear for diligent students, but , and .

Online comments stress tougher quizzes and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Material is followable with the textbook, but and detailed responses raise the challenge.

; online tests often feel harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some sections list attendance mandatory and participation-heavy; .

Online and in-person both vary; participation still matters for points and learning.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About half would take again; .

; recent online reviews are more critical.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and plagiarism-focused ding reduce leniency.

Format shift

Strictness is especially loud in online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Weekly readings, discussion posts, papers, and .

Format shift

Online ; in-person also has weekly responses.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some praise passion and learning community; , and boring lectures.

Format shift

Online experience suffers more from communication and quiz design issues.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Exams and and papers.

Format shift

Online emphasizes quizzes and closed-resource exams; and study guides.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person feedback splits between passionate, eye-opening classes with and complaints about fast lectures, boring delivery, and heavy responses.

Main concern

Fast lectures and .

What students said

“VERY passionate about answering questions related to the topics.”
ANTH002
“I took Cultural Anthro with Wilson and she is the .”
ANTH002
“She does go through the lectures too fast to write everything down, but all of the notes are posted online.”
ANTH001

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

heavy reading, tough , and poor email response for some.

Main concern

can tank the experience.

What students said

“In her attempt to make the , and overall horrible questions”
ANTH001
“you are not allowed to use notes or textbook materials on the midterm and !”
ANTH002
“Ms.Wilson doesn't read her emails at all.”
ANTH001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are high-stakes and often closed-resource, with study guides but .

Closed notes examsStudy guidesEssay examsHard quizzesNo late work

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as essay-focused with study guides and multi-hour timed tests; proctoring software not clearly stated.

All-essay examsStudy guidesTimed examsWeekly reading quizzes
“Exam? All essays, 2 1/2 hrs. A study guide is given.”
ANTH002
“There was an were keeping up”
ANTH001

Online

Online reviews report no notes or , and picky essay grading.

No notes or textbook on examsConfusing anti-cheat quizzesStudy guidesExtra credit essays
“you are not allowed to use notes or textbook materials on the midterm and !”
ANTH002
“ , and overall horrible questions that made each quiz unbearable.”
ANTH001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! Unless if you are required to take this class, which I had to.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting grading, workload, and communication themes. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Communication Issues

30/100

“Ms.Wilson doesn't read her emails at all.”

📚

30/100

“Be prepared to READ A LOT.”

⚖️

28/100

“She is a and blames everything on plagiarism.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof. Wilson is really straight-forward and you'll learn a lot.
  • She is the .
  • Was definitely a learning community feeling in class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but .
  • you are not allowed to use notes or textbook materials on the midterm and !
  • This is not a blow-off class, so be ready to read 25-60 pgs per week

Theme 3

💬 About Support & Workload

  • Does not accept late work under any circumstances
  • Grades very slowly.
  • Yes, she provides lots of , but would read a 15-20 page article and write a 4 page essay for only 5 points???

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews with both recent and older comments show consistent tough-grader and .

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ANTH00210 reviews
ANTH0016 reviews
ANT0023 reviews
ANTHRO32 reviews
ANTHR0021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 3 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values