AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Brandon Jaimes

CJ2 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you show up, keep up with reading, and want a caring first-semester instructor.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringClear grading criteriaGet ready to readParticipation mattersField-experienced
  • All three students would take him again and .
  • and , but overall difficulty stays low.
  • He is new to teaching yet brings real criminal justice field experience and fun review games.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Two A grades and one B with low average difficulty; students call him easy while and quizzes.

All evidence is from in-person CJ2 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Average difficulty is 1.5 and students emphasize ease, reviews, and .

All evidence is from in-person CJ2 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and one student says it is 15% of the grade.

; go to class is emphasized.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

100% take-again and repeated praise for kindness, clarity, and ease.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

, but overall tone is easy grades with and clear criteria.

Format shift

In-person only; but .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Reading, papers, group projects, and a .

Format shift

In-person only; tags include get ready to read and so many papers.

Teaching experience

Good

86/100

Students call him great, kind, and easy; first semester teaching but strong field experience and fun reviews.

Format shift

In-person only; .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of book reviews, a , and tests with collaboration allowed.

Format shift

In-person only; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person CJ2 is described as , and easy overall, with , and collaborative test help.

Main concern

and counts for a and papers.

What students said

“Really great & easy professor! It was his first semester teaching, but he has lots of experience in the field of CJ.”
CJ2
“ ”
CJ2
“great teacher”
CJ2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Only a , and reviews use fun games, making assessment student-friendly.

Few quizzesCollaborative test help allowedBlooket review gamesClear grading criteria

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and tests where students could talk for help.

Few quizzesTalk during tests allowedBlooket reviewPapers and book reviews
“we did a lot of reviews from the books and had maybe 3 quizzes in total.”
CJ2
“Could .”
CJ2
“Uses Blooket (Kahoot) to review, which is fun.”
CJ2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Really great & easy professor! It was his first semester teaching, but he has lots of experience in the field of CJ.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting kindness, low quiz load, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“ ”

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“great teacher”

❤️ About Character

85/100

“The professor was very kind, we did a lot of reviews from the books and had maybe 3 quizzes in total.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really great & easy professor!
  • Uses Blooket (Kahoot) to review, which is fun.
  • he has lots of experience in the field of CJ.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • maybe 3 quizzes in total
  • Go to class! It counts for 15% of your grade.
  • Could .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Three consistent in-person reviews across two years with matching praise and concrete class details, but still a small sample.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CJ23 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values