AI Rate Professor

Biological Sciences

Juliana Viera

Courses not reported · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you love biology and can handle heavy work with limited support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate about biologyPoor communicationHeavy homeworkTough graderLecture-heavy
  • One strong online review praises her passion and support; and poor communication.
  • Workload is heavy with and strict missing-work policies.
  • Small sample size means conclusions are tentative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Only one reported A; , and heavy work for middling grades.

The sole online review reports an A; and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Biology , and test anxiety in comments mark the course as challenging.

In-person emphasizes tough lectures and drawings; online still calls it challenging and rewarding.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and missing graded work can trigger drop threats even with a passing grade.

Both the online review and as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Only about one in ; three of four reviews discourage taking her if options exist.

; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tags and comments describe tough grading and strict policies on missing assignments.

Format shift

In-person stresses strictness; the online review does not contradict but is silent on leniency.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Weekly huge drawing and labeling assignments plus lecture-heavy structure create a heavy load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Passion for , but most students say lectures, communication, and support fall short.

Format shift

Online praise contrasts with in-person criticism of lectures and help.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

Large weekly drawings, participation, group projects, and ; exams are feared but less detailed.

Format shift

In-person focuses on drawings and homework; online mentions participation, , and group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

poor lectures, , and weak communication.

Main concern

Poor communication and unhelpful study support despite high workload and strict policies.

What students said

“You can tell she's passionate about biology, but the lectures aren't great at all.”
10499
“Very tough class and very poor communication.”
10499
“ if you have other options. Very poor communication and isn't in favor of helping you succeed”
10499

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Single online review is highly positive, calling her passionate, supportive of engaged students, and challenging but rewarding.

Main concern

Only one online review, so results may not generalize.

What students said

“She is an incredible professor who is deeply passionate about biology and genuinely wants her students to succeed.”
10499

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but students fear difficult tests with weak study-guide support.

Test anxiety mentionedNo strong study guidesLecture and drawing focused prep

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals after weak lectures and poorly made study guides.

Poor or no study guidesTest-heavy worry
“I am genuinely horrified for .”
10499
“she does NOT believe in study guides, when asked for one, they were poorly made and graded”
10499

Online

The single online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you have other options. Very poor communication and isn't in favor of helping you succeed”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews with one online and . Credibility rating: Low.

🔬 Passion for Biology

70/100

“She is an incredible professor who is deeply passionate about biology and genuinely wants her students to succeed.”

📡 Poor Communication

25/100

“Very tough class and very poor communication.”

✏️

26/100

“Each week we have a and label a bunch of things.”

🚫 Recommendation Split

28/100

“ if you have other options.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the lectures aren't great at all. We seriously get 2 hours of lecturing, yet .
  • Very poor communication and isn't in favor of helping you succeed
  • deeply passionate about biology

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Work

  • and label a bunch of things
  • Very tough class
  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • Very passive aggressive and STRICT
  • will threaten to drop you for a

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 reviews with mixed extremes and limited grade detail reduce confidence despite recent dates.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

104994 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1