AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Sandra Moore

SOC001 · SJS030 · SOC023 · SOCS30 · SOCSC030 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can self-manage vague instructions, group work, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSlow gradingGroup projects heavyParticipation mattersBusy workOpinionated lectures
  • Content can be easy but , and
  • Mandatory participation and group projects matter;
  • some feel inspired, many cite bias, vague instructions, and poor communication

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many call content easy, but effort and late-grade surprises make an A less automatic.

Online workload spikes in SJS030; and projects.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Material is often described as easy or routine, with .

Online SJS030 felt much heavier than typical SOC001.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Multiple reviews mark attendance mandatory with .

; online attendance is usually not.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

; organization and communication issues dominate.

A few strong in-person fans exist, but online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some say not too harsh; others report inconsistent participation credit and .

Format shift

; online main issue is late grading visibility.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Weekly discussions, papers, group projects, and occasional volunteer reports pile up.

Format shift

Online SJS030 is especially assignment-heavy versus some lighter SOC sections.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

and biased.

Format shift

In-person has both raves and sharp criticism; online focuses on course design flaws.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reaction papers, discussions, group projects, and .

Format shift

One in-person .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and complaints about bias, busy work, and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“An easy class, but she's very animated and biased.”
SOC001
“Literally just regurgitates the and still ”
SOC001
“Professor Moore is an amazing teacher she really helps you better understand things”
SOC001

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report confusing Canvas , and .

Main concern

Missing calendar items and .

What students said

“ way, making ”
SOC001
“This teacher .”
SJS030
“She also only graded 5 out of 24 assignments the ”
SOCSC030

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; take-home open-book tests appear, with heavy project and paper load.

Take-home testsOpen bookReaction papersFinal project

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; others stress final projects and reaction papers.

Take-home open bookFinal projectReaction papers
“ and open book.”
SOC001
“All we did was watch videos and .”
SOC023

Online

Online comments focus on discussions, lesson questions, group projects, and .

Weekly discussionsGroup projectDelayed grading
“there is a discussion every week, 6 lesson questions pertaining to 2 chapters in the reading”
SJS030
“Grades slowly, so you don't have a gauge of .”
SOC001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall an easy class but with major flaws. way, making .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting organization, workload, and polarization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🐢 Slow Communication

30/100

“ timely manner.”

📚

35/100

“This teacher .”

🔀 Polarized Experience

45/100

“Professor Moore is an amazing teacher she really helps you better understand things, fun class discussions”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she's very animated and biased
  • regurgitates the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Overall an easy class but with major flaws
  • my grade dropped to a

Theme 3

🧩 Organization Issues

  • way
  • only graded 5 out of 24 assignments the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews from 2016-2026 show repeated slow-grading and organization themes with polarized quality.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 51

Course coverage

SOC0016 reviews
SOC0232 reviews
SJS0301 review
SOCS301 review
SOCSC0301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2