AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Nadia Biglari

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if possible; get a tutor and expect little support or .

Best fit · Self Taught ProInaccessible outside classLate lecture postsUnpreparedIgnores emailsHumiliating classroom tone
  • Students report unprepared teaching, late materials, and no outside help
  • Online grade and exams; labs go ungraded
  • Both reviews advise avoiding her and seeking another chemistry instructor

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible but and .

; online student earned a B with heavy platform work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty ratings and comments describe a hard, poorly supported chemistry load.

In-person rated difficulty 5; online difficulty 3 with lots of Aktiv work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

.

and in-person sections per the reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

and .

Both formats strongly advise against taking her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

and and unsupportive.

Format shift

Online emphasizes ungraded labs; .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of homework and .

Format shift

Online explicitly tags lots of homework; .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Late, unprepared delivery and humiliating class dynamics dominate both reviews.

Format shift

Online fails on timely content; in-person fails on respect and preparation.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework and ; labs exist but may not be graded.

Format shift

; in-person details are thinner.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students describe lateness, unpreparedness, humiliation for participating, and no office help.

Main concern

Hostile participation climate and .

What students said

“She made it clear that , so don't waste your time.”
210
“She has a tendency to humiliate you for knowing answers-- so don't participate too much in class.”
210

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online CHEM 210 suffered , and .

Main concern

Late content posts and .

What students said

“The professor would always post lecture videos late (the ).”
210
“ , and it's three weeks into the new one and never responds to emails.”
210

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but comments do not prove proctoring software details.

Aktiv Chemistry examsHomework-heavyLabs ungraded

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

beyond overall difficulty.

Online

Online and exams; proctoring style is not clearly described.

Aktiv Chemistry examsHomework on AktivLate lecture videos
“I'm pretty sure the only things that counted towards our final grade were homeworks on Aktiv Chemistry and .”
210

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just do yourself a favor and take another teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 highly consistent negative reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Disaster

15/100

“She doesn't show up on time, and isn't really prepared.”

📧 Unresponsive

20/100

“ .”

⚠️ Hostile Tone

18/100

“She has a tendency to humiliate you for knowing answers-- so don't participate too much in class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • isn't really prepared
  • post lecture videos late
  • inaccessible outside of class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • only things that counted towards our final grade were homeworks on Aktiv Chemistry and Exams

Theme 3

💔 Student Care

  • humiliate you for knowing answers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two recent reviews, both negative and detailed, but sample size is too small for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

2102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values