AI Rate Professor

Cosmetology

Shaunice Cole

COSM100 · COSM101 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
41.18%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you are thick-skinned, self-motivated, and laser-focused on state board prep.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing personalityTough graderState board prep focusLots of homeworkStrict classroom tone
  • Reviews split hard between state-board success stories and fear-based, angry-classroom complaints.
  • , and perfection standards drive a heavy practical load.
  • , and several students say questions get shut down.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students land As, but , and heavy practical work make an A feel earned the hard way.

Online evidence is sparse and negative; most .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

High difficulty ratings and , and perfection expectations make the content feel demanding.

Both formats lean hard; the single online review also rates difficulty high.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and skip-class warnings appear repeatedly.

Online and as required.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

41/100

About two in ; fans cite board prep while critics warn about fear and unfair treatment.

Online review is a ; in-person opinions are split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

, and students report inconsistent standards and fear of pushback.

Format shift

; online does not soften that picture.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and constant self-critique create a heavy practical load.

Format shift

Workload pressure is documented almost entirely in in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Some students call her inspiring and board-ready, but many more describe anger, poor nail instruction, and blocked questions.

Format shift

Online is purely negative; in-person remains deeply split.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and tests rather than one pure exam track.

Format shift

Assessment detail .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some students praise board prep and self-critique skills, others report scolding, grade chaos, and fear of asking questions.

Main concern

, and a harsh classroom climate.

What students said

“Great teacher that helps with what to know after you are graduated.”
COSM101
“She scold students like kindergartners when asking questions.”
COSM101
“ .”
COSM100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The lone online review is strongly negative and reports feeling talked down to with little valuable learning.

Main concern

Harsh questioning style and low learning value online.

What students said

“Absolutely awful. If you want to sit and be questioned about your work and feel like a child then youll love them.”
COSM101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students emphasize tests and board-style .

Test heavyState board preparationHomework and ops trackingParticipation matters

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and state-board style practical tracking rather than clearly student-friendly exams.

Test heavyState board prepHomework heavyOps and signatures
“Good course go getting you prepared for state boards.”
COSM101
“still needed multiple office hours to complete operations for certification.”
COSM100

Online

Online comments .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She scold students like kindergartners when asking questions. Everyone is afraid to ask questions but then she will also get mad if no one engages.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews (1 online, 16 in person), highlighting polarization in , and board prep. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“Very awful and always angry for no reason”

👍 Recommendation Split

41/100

“Great teacher! Strict but great.”

⚖️

24/100

“She claims to have high standards, but in reality she expects perfection.”

📚 Workload Load

28/100

“As long as ! your good.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's very passionate about teaching.
  • Teaching requires patience. She scold students like kindergartners
  • and not the most efficient.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • .
  • Just do the homework and work on your timing on application

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Climate

  • Everyone is afraid to ask questions
  • Her actions lead to me and others thinking their work will never be good enough
  • She loves to see you improve and win.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across years with , and board prep make the polarized pattern highly credible.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 58

Course coverage

COSM10111 reviews
COSM1006 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Rather not say 3