AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Ed Goldberg

CJ001 · CJ57 · CJ002 · CJ057 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want real-world speakers and a fair grade path.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGuest speakers galoreTests from PowerPointsCaring and helpfulExtra credit friendlyReal-world CJ insight
  • Most , and highly recommendable for CJ.
  • PowerPoint-based tests, essays, and .
  • , but that review was heavily downvoted.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Students report A and A+ grades with .

All evidence is in-person.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Material is introductory and interesting, with .

All evidence is in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and others mandatory, so expectations depend on the term.

Only in-person reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

About 86% would take again, with multiple glowing recommendations and one contested negative.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Graded by few things, flexible due dates, , and mostly A-range reported grades.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Light

72/100

Main load is essays, PowerPoint study, and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Widely praised as knowledgeable, caring, and inspiring despite one disorganization complaint.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of and final exams, and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

tests, and flexible essay deadlines.

Main concern

Organization and due-date clarity can slip for some students.

What students said

“He invites several guest speakers throughout the semester. The midterm and but not to difficult.”
CJ002
“Goldberg has an and .”
CJ57

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams track his PowerPoints closely and are described as long but manageable.

PowerPoint-aligned testsLong but not difficult examsExtra creditGuest speakers

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals are long but not hard, drawn directly from posted PowerPoints.

PowerPoint-based testsFlexible essay deadlinesExtra credit
“The midterm and but not to difficult.”
CJ002
“His tests were based directly off of .”
CJ001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews, weighing consensus praise against one contested critique. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Lt. Goldberg is one of the .”

📈 Easy Fair Grades

86/100

“ . Great and helpful professor”

👍 Recommendation

88/100

“ .”

⚠️ Organization Complaint

40/100

“Goldberg has an and .”

Theme 1

👮 About Real-World Teaching

  • He invites several guest speakers throughout the semester.
  • very informative and he made the learning interesting with stories.
  • You do a mock oral board, for anyone going into L.E. it really does help a lot!

Theme 2

📈

  • The midterm and but not to difficult.
  • His tests were based directly off of
  • Do all the work & you'll pass

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He is a very well rounded man that truly cares about his students
  • Very knowledgeable, fair, honest, and a real pleasure
  • Ed is a great guy!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed in-person reviews from 2015-2023 largely agree, with one heavily downvoted outlier.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CJ0013 reviews
CJ573 reviews
CJ0021 review
CJ0571 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 4

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values