AI Rate Professor

American Sign Language

Deanna Gann

ASL002 · ASL001 · ASL01 · ASL006 · ASL2 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
41.67%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Expect a ; strong for motivated students who keep up daily, risky if you need structure and prep.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPop QuizzesStrict RulesMood DependentCaring Or UnpreparedParticipation Heavy
  • ASL skill classes can feel fair and supportive when students do all work and participate.
  • Linguistics and some online sections draw harsh criticism for unprepared, book-reading lectures.
  • Pop quizzes, no late work, and hard language load.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

Some call it an easy A if and participate, but and pop quizzes block free As.

Online has both easy-pass caring reports and hard linguistics complaints; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

ASL and especially linguistics content is demanding, fast, and often poorly scaffolded for average beginners.

Online linguistics reviews paint the hardest picture; in-person ASL2 also feels tough for many.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and participation-linked quizzes.

Both online and and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

About two in ; love her when prepared and .

ASL; online ASL006 and some in-person ASL2 drive avoid ratings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Tough-grader tags, denied last-minute , and no late work make grades feel unforgiving.

Format shift

Strictness appears in both online and in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

Lots of , and surprise quizzes keep weekly load high.

Format shift

Homework and and in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

and funny; , and book-reading without real teaching.

Format shift

In-person is mixed; online is more extreme between highly caring and disaster linguistics.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Homework, participation, pop quizzes, and type.

Format shift

; and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ASL1-2 ranges from fun easy-A if you work to tough, mood-driven teaching with pop quizzes.

Main concern

Inconsistent preparation, pop quizzes, and .

What students said

“ ! She's fun and funny. Don't expect to pass if .”
ASL001
“ so beware of her!”
ASL002
“I scored a 89.78% and she marked it as a B, after denying my .”
ASL001

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews split between highly caring ASL002 support and severe ASL006 linguistics unpreparedness with no learning.

Main concern

Unprepared advanced content and zero flexibility on late work in some online sections.

What students said

“Hi I can honestly say this is the .”
ASL002
“She did not teach any of us in the class a thing the entire semester.”
ASL006
“She does not accept late work under any circumstances”
ASL006

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and pop quizzes more than clearly student-friendly open exams.

Pop QuizzesParticipation GradedHomework HeavyNo Late Work

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation-linked assessment.

Pop QuizzesParticipation MattersHomework Checks
“ so beware of her!”
ASL002
“Pop quizzes happen when she realizes no .”
ASL2

Online

Online reviews do not clearly describe proctoring; , and unprepared lectures.

Participation RequiredHomework DrivenNo Late Work
“Passing her class is simple, all you have to do is participate in class, and .”
ASL002
“She does not accept late work under any circumstances”
ASL006

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far the so far here at Solano. This was her first time teaching linguistics and she was unprepared”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews across online and . Credibility rating: Medium.

💔 Unprepared Teaching

36/100

“She did not teach any of us in the class a thing the entire semester.”

❤️

80/100

“this is the .”

⚡

30/100

“ so beware of her!”

📏

35/100

“I scored a 89.78% and she marked it as a B, after denying my .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • all .
  • She's fun and funny.
  • Each class session was solely dependent on her mood

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • easy A, just do your work.
  • She is not a . As long as you try, you'll be fine.
  • She is a tough teacher and a .

Theme 3

📋 About Rules And Attendance

  • She does not accept late work under any circumstances
  • Don't expect to pass if .
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews from 2019-2025 give decent detail but opinions diverge sharply by course level and format.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ASL0024 reviews
ASL0013 reviews
ASL0063 reviews
ASL011 review
ASL21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2