AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Michelle Mack

ACS10 · COUN005 · COUN062 · CO062 · COUN62 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Skip her if and ; only risk it if you can self-manage fully.

Best fit · Self Taught ProProcrastinator instructorLate Canvas gradesPoor feedbackDisorganized onlineInconsistent quality
  • Most reviews call her a procrastinator who delays grades and feedback.
  • Course content itself is not described as intellectually hard.
  • A minority of students found the class fun and worthwhile.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Content is often called easy or manageable, but and chaos make outcomes unpredictable.

Online reviews emphasize chaos more than grade difficulty; in-person includes both easy As and incomplete grades.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Counseling entry courses are described as not hard intellectually; the pain is organization, not concepts.

Both formats say the work itself is not the hard part.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some sections mark attendance mandatory, others optional, with .

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Only about 29 percent would take her again and most comments urge students to pass.

; in-person has two strong yeses against three nos.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

; the problem is late grade updates and .

Format shift

; in-person stresses last-week grade dumps.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Some tags say lots of homework, but others call workload manageable for an entry class.

Format shift

Online tags lean heavy; .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

, and low availability despite a couple of fun-class reviews.

Format shift

Online is uniformly poor; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments center on homework and .

Format shift

Neither format clearly describes major exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and a couple of fun, engaging class praises.

Main concern

Last-minute grade dumps and ignored emails can turn a passing track into a fail overnight.

What students said

“She waited until the last week of the semester to update the grade section in canvas.”
COUN005
“ of an educator! Youre better off teaching yourself!”
CO062
“Professor Mack made the entry level class fun and engaging. The workload was manageable and worthwhile.”
COUN005

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and unavailability.

Main concern

and outdated Canvas due dates make progress tracking impossible.

What students said

“Worst teacher I have ever had. to do.”
COUN062
“she doesn't know how to use canvas in the online and is a big procrastinator”
ACS10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exam formats; .

Assignment-basedLate grade posting

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

rather than a documented exam policy.

Late Canvas grade updates
“She waited until the last week of the semester to update the grade section in canvas.”
COUN005

Online

Online reviews do .

No timely feedbackOutdated due dates
“ to do. She does not grade and gives work over breaks”
COUN062

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ of an educator! Youre better off teaching yourself!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, focusing on organization failures versus a small positive minority. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Who pays a professor who is a procrastinator & doesnt want to work?”

🕒

20/100

“She waited until the last week of the semester to update the grade section in canvas.”

💻 Online Support Failure

15/100

“she doesn't know how to use canvas in the online ”

🎉 Minority Positive View

75/100

“She's a fantastic professor! Absolutely awesome! Her class was so much fun and insightful!”

Theme 1

🕒 About Organization

  • She is a procrastinator
  • Her due dates still from last year doesn't update them
  • doesnt answer emails

Theme 2

📊

  • Many students dropped from a passing grade to failing in a matter of hours
  • She does not grade and gives work over breaks

Theme 3

❤️ Occasional Praise

  • made the entry level class fun and engaging
  • The workload was manageable and worthwhile
  • Her class was so much fun and insightful!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews with vivid operational complaints form a , but the sample is small and slightly mixed.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

COUN0052 reviews
COUN0622 reviews
ACS101 review
CO0621 review
COUN621 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1