AI Rate Professor

Human Development

Amy Obigee

CDFS70 · CDFS71 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Evidence is too thin and split; treat recent online sections as high workload risk and verify current expectations.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing WorkloadClear ExplainerHeavy Online LoadSincere Mentor
  • Only two reviews exist and they conflict sharply by format and year.
  • Recent online CDFS70 feedback cites crushing workload and breakdowns.
  • recommended teacher.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

; one review implies heavy work and the other says work is normal for the class.

Online suggests high effort cost; in person is more optimistic but still not .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty averages mid-range, with online rated very hard and in person rated easy.

Online difficulty is high; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

One recent no versus one older strong yes leaves recommendation dependent on format and era.

; in-person reviewer highly recommends her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

; nothing proves harsh or .

Format shift

Neither online .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Online ; in person admits work can be much.

Format shift

Workload concern is driven almost entirely by the recent online review.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Quality scores split 2 and 5, producing a mixed blended teaching picture.

Format shift

Online quality is poor; older in-person quality is excellent.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments emphasize assigned work load rather than exams.

Format shift

Online focuses on assignment volume; in person mentions general class work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The , and recommends taking every class she teaches for the major.

Main concern

Work can still be substantial even when teaching is praised.

What students said

“She is a GREAT teacher. She makes everything easy to understand so learn it and it sticks.”
CDFS71

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The sole online review says the semester started with and multiple mental breakdowns.

Main concern

Immediate heavy workload load right at term start.

What students said

“The semester just started and I already had multiple mental breakdowns from the amount of work assigned.”
CDFS70

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

rules.

Online

Online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The semester just started and I already had multiple mental breakdowns from the amount of work assigned.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in person). Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Online Workload Shock

20/100

“The semester just started and I already had multiple mental breakdowns from the amount of work assigned.”

🌟

90/100

“ . Be respectful, on time, and have fun. !!”

Theme 1

📈 About Workload

  • multiple mental breakdowns from the amount of work assigned
  • The work can be much but no different than any other class.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes everything easy to understand so learn it and it sticks.
  • She always answers your questions and is sincere.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews, seven years apart, with opposite tones and no grade detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CDFS701 review
CDFS711 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values