AI Rate Professor

English

Traci Cohen

ENG001 · ENGLISH · ENGL001 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

if you need the section and and participate; otherwise look elsewhere.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHard GraderParticipation MattersGroup ProjectsExtra CreditPolarizing Personality
  • One review says first-year students can pass with essays and effort.
  • Others call her a and .
  • Expect required book use, participation, and essay-focused English work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

One student says effort can earn an A, but and .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Difficulty ratings and comments point to a demanding English load, especially essays and .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and participation is stressed for the grade.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Only one of and hard-grader complaints.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

not especially tough if she sees effort, but also called a .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Essays, group projects, participation, and a required book keep the load real but not overwhelming for everyone.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Some find her great for first college English; others report rude, sarcastic, unprofessional treatment.

Format shift

All evidence is in person and highly split.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Essays, participation, group projects, and .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

or unprofessional for others.

Main concern

Personality and .

What students said

“Shes really not that difficult and if you do all the .”
ENGL001
“Rudest unprofessional professor Ive ever encountered.”
ENG001
“Definitely a .”
ENGLISH

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essays and .

Essay HeavyParticipationGroup ProjectsExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment centers on essays, participation, group projects, and ; .

Essay HeavyParticipationGroup ProjectsExtra Credit
“if you do all the . She's not a and honestly if she sees you trying it's not hard to get an A.”
ENGL001
“Definitely a .”
ENGLISH

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but, as soon as you get the chance.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting the and harsh-personality complaints. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Professor Cohen is a great professor for students taking their first college class.”

⚠️ Personality Concerns

20/100

“Rudest unprofessional professor Ive ever encountered. Has a sarcastic attitude.”

⚖️ Grading

38/100

“Definitely a .”

👍 Recommendation

34/100

“ but, as soon as you get the chance.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • great professor for students taking their first college class
  • Rudest unprofessional professor Ive ever encountered
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • if you do all the
  • Definitely a
  • if she sees you trying it's not hard to get an A

Theme 3

📝 About Course Work

  • Participation matters
  • Group projects
  • You do use the book she assigns so you might as well get it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three in-person reviews from early 2019 with sharp disagreement and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG0011 review
ENGL0011 review
ENGLISH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values