AI Rate Professor

Mathematics & Science

Dmitry Yandulov

CHEM01 · CHEM160 · MATH104 · CHEM001 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
43.75%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Only take him if you can sit through long lectures and foundation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMonotone lecture marathonExtra credit lifelineOverexplains simple ideasLots of homeworkSmart but hard to follow
  • Lectures are dense, long, and monotone, so many students teach themselves from the book.
  • and late full-credit work can rescue grades if you keep up with homework.
  • Experience and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

and late full-credit work open a path to an A, but and study hard.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Material is dense and he overcomplicates simple ideas, so many students rely on the textbook.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

38/100

Some sections mark attendance mandatory or say skipping tanks you; others list it as optional.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

44/100

; the other half urge students to avoid the monotone overload.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

, but and late full-credit work soften the final grade.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of and lectures regularly eat lab time.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

Deeply knowledgeable and often caring one-on-one, yet lectures are monotone, circular, and hard to absorb.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and exams, with worksheets and study guides as prep.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person chemistry is lecture-heavy with piles of homework; caring students get help and , but many find him monotonous and confusing.

Main concern

Long monotone lectures that overexplain and .

What students said

“ !!!”
CHEM001
“You can get an A if you do the homework, and actually study.”
CHEM160
“he monotonally lectures about every nook and cranny of chemistry past the ”
CHEM001

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Practice worksheets and study guides prepare you; exams still reward memorization and .

Study guidesWorksheets harder than examsIn-person midterms

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides; content still feels lecture-heavy.

Study guidesWorksheets harder than examsLecture-aligned tests
“Does a lot to prepare you for .”
CHEM001
“ !”
CHEM001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Run for the hills! ... he is so boring! He goes way into too much detail and assigns tons of homework.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 in-person reviews, highlighting lecture style, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Lecture Density

32/100

“he makes the simplest ideas into long complex lectures”

🎯 Safety Net

70/100

“He gives A LOT of definit one of ”

👍 Split Recommendation

44/100

“ .”

📝

24/100

“always do your HW's or it'll pile up”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Extremely monotone
  • so much that
  • breaks things down so you understand it

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Focus on the homework and , you will get an A
  • gives you lots of opportunities to save your grade

Theme 3

⏰ About Workload & Time

  • we were always held in the class room way longer than the scheduled time
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

22 detailed in-person reviews from 2014-2019 with , and .

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHEM00114 reviews
CHEM1606 reviews
CHEM011 review
MATH1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1