AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Susanna Crawford

MATH · MATH4 · INTER104 · MATH102104 · MATH12 · MATH102 · INTERALGEBRA · MATH11 · STATS011 · MATH011 · MATH330 · STATS11 · STATS · MATH104 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material well and can teach yourself; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProScatter-brained lecturesSends students to math labFast and unclearLots of homeworkTest heavy
  • Many students , and .
  • Help is often redirected to the math lab rather than explained in class.
  • A smaller group of prepared adults find her workable if they speak up and self-study.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

frequently warned, and several students report D or F despite effort.

Almost all evidence is in person; the one online review also ended in F.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Pace is fast, concepts are poorly scaffolded, and many say you must already know the material.

In-person comments dominate; the single online review also called the class hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

while others report no roll and little concern about who shows up.

Attendance comments .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Despite a not to enroll because teaching is unclear and unhelpful.

Online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and reported high fail rates make high marks hard even with .

Format shift

Harsh outcomes appear mainly in in-person math courses.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly cite lots of homework, in-class problem sets, and test-heavy pacing.

Format shift

Workload complaints .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Dominant theme is rushed, scattered lectures with little effective help in class.

Format shift

One online review matches the same unhelpful pattern as most in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Homework exists but grades and and .

Format shift

; online evidence is too thin to compare.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and weak classroom help, with a few positives for disciplined self-starters.

Main concern

and often leaves students to figure it out alone.

What students said

“ if at all, is constantly in a state of stressed/rushed with lectures, and ends up sending you to the MAC to figure it out.”
MATH104
“This instructor is horrible. She is all over the place. UNLESS you are a math genius.”
MATH104
“An excellent instructor for disciplined ADULTS. Don't expect to be coddled and handed an easy pass.”
MATH330

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online report describes absentee instruction, constant subs, and .

Main concern

Instructor rarely present and pushes all help to the math lab.

What students said

“Horrible teacher. She is never in class we always have a sub. When ask for help she always says "work in it in the math lab".”
10279

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and are often harder than daily work, with little student-friendly policy detail.

Test heavyQuizzes harder than homeworkComputer homework

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Tests and quizzes are frequent and commonly described as .

Test heavyQuizzes harder than HW
“the hw was on course compass which was easy but daily hw.”
MATH102
“she and weighs your grade mostly on the final.”
MATH102

Online

.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I beg of . You'll if you struggle with math.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews (1 online, 33 in , and limited classroom help. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Clarity

32/100

“ if at all, is constantly in a state of stressed/rushed with lectures, and ends up sending you to the MAC to figure it out.”

🚫 Recommendation

32/100

“Run fast, run far from this teacher. Bottom line: .”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“ 3 which in many sections is overwhelming and repetative compared to other teachers.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she will just write mumbo jumbo on the board
  • She is all over the place
  • late to class. She talks about family issues as she cries.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • 50% of the students will FAIL
  • daily hw
  • If you even slightly apply yourself you should get an A.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support & Character

  • She didn't care about helping
  • Getting help from her is complicated. She sends you straight to the math lab.
  • This professor was really nice and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

34 reviews spanning many years with consistent themes of and heavy testing support a reliable read.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 514

Course coverage

MATH10412 reviews
MATH1023 reviews
STATS3 reviews
INTER1042 reviews
MATH0112 reviews
Show 10 more courses
MATH112 reviews
MATH3302 reviews
102791 review
INTERALGEBRA1 review
MATH1 review
MATH1021041 review
MATH121 review
MATH41 review
STATS0111 review
STATS111 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values