AI Rate Professor

English

Cicely Young

ENG001 · ENGL004 · ENGL001 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take her only if you will attend every , and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAttendance mandatoryTough essay graderReading heavyLaid-back discussionsSoft-spoken
  • and skipping hurts your grade.
  • She is nice and discussion-focused, but .
  • some love the vibe, others dropped over phone distraction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Passing is easy if you attend and read, but writing effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is manageable with reading and discussion, though lectures run long and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Multiple reviews and tags stress that skipping class means you will not pass.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; praise for niceness and and soft-spoken chaos.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Students say and raises page counts even when the class itself feels easy.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect steady reading, group projects, discussions, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Interactive and respectful for some, but soft-spoken with weak phone control for others.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and progressively longer essays.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person and discussion, a nice but soft-spoken instructor, and mixed grading fairness.

Main concern

, and weak classroom management for phones and noise.

What students said

“You have to try hard to fail this class. Read anything she assigns!”
ENG001
“Definitely an , but !”
ENGL001
“It's a fairly easy class and she's a .”
ENGL004

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment blends tests, group work, and essays; reviews .

Test heavyLecture heavyGroup projectsEssay focus

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections are described as test- and lecture-heavy with group projects and graded essays.

Test heavyLecture heavyGroup projects
“Very text/lecture heavy class”
ENGL001
“Had a .”
ENG001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's a fairly easy class and she's a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 , and classroom control. Credibility rating: Medium.

📌

12/100

“Definitely an , but !”

📝

38/100

“It's a fairly easy class and she's a .”

👍 Can Be Fun If You Show Up

52/100

“She was great! ... I slacked off a lot and still earned a good grade.”

📵 Weak Classroom Control

30/100

“Everyone was one their phone and laptop and it was very distracting... She did nothing about it”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to try hard to fail this class.
  • she's a .
  • Read anything she assigns!

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • ! If there is an actual emergency, she is willing to be flexible
  • she does lecture but they are interactive so its fun.
  • She is very soft spoken so it is very hard to hear her.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • !!!! Very text/lecture heavy class
  • Had a .
  • We had 3 books in total we answered questions on in small groups.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed reviews from 2016-2017 show recurring attendance and , but the small sample and split opinions lower confidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG0012 reviews
ENGL0012 reviews
ENGL0041 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1