AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rebecca Lum

MATHMATH · BADMINTON · MATH103 · MATH102 · BEGTENNIS · MATH310 · MATH330 · MATH104 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Only take her if and ; otherwise pick another math instructor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing StyleHomework Optional CollectHigh AttritionInspirational for SomeMakes Mistakes
  • some call her the .
  • but .
  • Rude remarks and lecture mistakes drive many students out of the class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

A is possible if and seek help, but , and withdrawals.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

40/100

Material is standard college math, but weak lectures and few worked hard problems raise the real challenge.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and others optional; success still depends on being present for handouts.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

Recent yes votes exist, but many detailed reviews say never recommend her despite the .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

; others say wrong marks and few As despite correct work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

and often not collected, but .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Inspirational and helpful for engaged students; others report mistakes, short lectures, and rudeness.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, so tests and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and lecture-heavy classes that either inspire or frustrate.

Main concern

, and blunt tone cause high dropout risk.

What students said

“Professor Lum is hands down the .”
MATH104
“Ms. Lum was the .”
MATH330
“class started 30+ ended with 8, 2-3 As”
MATHMATH

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

while ; difficulty and fairness reports conflict.

Exam-HeavyHomework Practice Not Always GradedNo Trick Questions (some)Handout Notes

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Tests matter most; some students find and class averages low.

Exam-HeavyHomework Practice Not Always GradedHandout Notes
“ , and no trick questions.”
MATH310
“she will if you get them right.”
MATHMATH

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She has confidence in her students and that is what will motivate you to succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 in-person , and attrition. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“She does not appear to know the material real well.”

❤️ Motivation vs Tone

55/100

“She really dose work hard to help anyone willing to put in the time.”

📉 Class Survival

30/100

“we strted out with like 30 people in the class and on the last day we had ten.”

👍 Recommendation Split

46/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She wants to see you progress in the class and not just pass to pass.
  • always makes mistakes.
  • Her discussions last between 5-15 minutes and she just gives you handouts

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Only the people who want to learn and do the .
  • the highest grade was like a "C"
  • As long as you try, you will get an A.

Theme 3

💬 About Classroom Climate

  • refers to students as "You People"
  • she is just extremely rude.
  • some people have a hard time with her honesty

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

18 reviews from 2003-2017 with rich, opposing detail and stable themes of attrition and .

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH3305 reviews
MATH1024 reviews
MATH1043 reviews
MATH3102 reviews
BADMINTON1 review
Show 3 more courses
BEGTENNIS1 review
MATH1031 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1