AI Rate Professor

Mathematics & Science

Glenn Scott

MATH103 · MATH330ELMALG · MATH330 · MATH320 · MATH104 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will attend, do the homework, and want a passionate math teacher who rewards consistent effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesLecture heavyHomework requiredPassionate teacherHit-or-miss clarity
  • and strong support before and after class.
  • Homework and ; skipping either can sink your grade.
  • A minority found him confusing, tough, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

An A is realistic if , and study, but work is required and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Math content is standard difficulty; , but pace and notes still challenge many students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

and skipping class is widely said to hurt your chance of passing.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and clarity, though a vocal minority strongly advise avoiding him.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and caring, while some label him a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Expect lots of , and penalties for missing assignments.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Majority praise amazing lectures and support; minority report confusion and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and participation-related points.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, required homework, and mostly strong teaching when students engage.

Main concern

Heavy notes and for some students.

What students said

“He is one of the most passionate teachers I have ever encountered.”
MATH330
“If I asked him to clarify something, .”
MATH103
“You MUST turn in all HW or you will lose 40 pts automatically.”
MATH104

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; some allow limited notes and some feel study guides do not match.

In-person testsStudy guides varyHalf-sheet notes sometimesTricky but doable

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and doable with notes to tricky or mismatched with study guides.

In-person examsLimited notes on finalStudy guide mismatch reported
“He does not put anything that's on the study guide in your test.”
MATH330
“He lets you have a 1/2 sheet of notes for the and back.”
MATH104

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“In terms of teaching ability - EASILY the ! Commands the room and clearly communicates with humor, intelligence, and charm.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 in-person , and mixed clarity. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Split

78/100

“ and all of the positive reviews are accurate.”

📚

42/100

“You MUST turn in all HW or you will lose 40 pts automatically.”

⚠️ Clarity Concerns

35/100

“I didn't understand anything he was talking about.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • He genuinely loves teaching math & it shows.
  • Commands the room and clearly communicates with humor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You MUST turn in all HW or you will lose 40 pts automatically.
  • if you have paid attention.
  • He does not put anything that's on the study guide in your test.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He genuinely cares about his students
  • ALWAYS answers questions
  • .
  • I felt very uncomfortable with him.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen detailed in-person reviews across years show a and some dissent.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1047 reviews
MATH3307 reviews
MATH1032 reviews
MATH330ELMALG2 reviews
MATH3201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1