AI Rate Professor

EMT Paramedic

James Zuniga

EMT128 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Avoid unless required; you may need to self-teach from the book despite light difficulty.

Best fit · Self Taught ProWeird GradingPowerpoint HeavyRead HeavyMandatory AttendanceField Experience
  • experienced in the field but weak teaching style.
  • and test performance.
  • and skipping risks failing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Student did poorly on tests yet still got a good grade, so grades may not track true mastery.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Difficulty rated 1, but and PowerPoints.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Tagged Skip class? You won't pass and as mandatory.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and was not fond of his teaching.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Weird grading let the student earn a .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

PowerPoint lectures and .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Field experience is noted, but teaching style left the student feeling unlearned.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Tests matter, yet the grade outcome felt misaligned with test performance.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person EMT class leans on PowerPoints with and .

Main concern

and weak lecture .

What students said

“Hes experienced in the field but i wasnt really fond of the way he taught.”
EMT128

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests exist, but reviews do .

In-Person TestsPowerPoint-Based Content

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Student reports doing poorly on tests while still receiving a good grade; format details beyond that .

In-Person Tests
“I did but got a good grade.”
EMT128

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hes experienced in the field but i wasnt really fond of the way he taught.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting field experience versus weak teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“Hes experienced in the field but i wasnt really fond of the way he taught.”

⚖️

70/100

“The as if i didn't learn a thing because I did pretty horribly on my test but got a good grade.”

📚

40/100

“If you need help, read the book or reach out to him”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • we learned more on the powerpoint lectures
  • We got textbooks but barely used it
  • If you need help, read the book or reach out to him

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The
  • I did but got a good grade.
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Single 2016 review with limited grade detail and no corroborating opinions.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EMT1281 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values