AI Rate Professor

English

Larissa Juarez

ENG004 · ENG2 · ENG011 · ENG1 · ENG001 · ENGLI1065 · ENGWR300 · ENGLI2 · ENGLIE001 · ENGL001 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other English option and while meeting strict rules.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRude to studentsOff-topic personal storiesHarsh deadlinesStrict attendanceLittle useful feedback
  • Many students call her rude, dismissive, and high-school-like in class management.
  • Class time often drifts into personal stories instead of English content.
  • and late work is punished harshly, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Homework and , but tiny mistakes, late-by-a-second zeros, and .

Nearly all evidence is in person; the one online review did not finish the course.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Content itself is mixed, but , and confusing expectations make the experience feel hard.

Difficulty reports .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as and penalties for missing books or being minutes late.

; online evidence is silent.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students urge others to look elsewhere due to rudeness, wasted class time, and .

Both the lone online review and the bulk of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students report zero-for-late policies, impossible-to-please standards, and grades that feel picky rather than fair.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Workload centers on reading, essays, and weekly tasks; volume is moderate but penalties make it feel heavier.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Frequent complaints about personal rants, rudeness, contradiction, and little real instruction on writing or reading.

Format shift

Poor teaching reports dominate both formats, with far more detail in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment leans on essays, reading responses, quizzes, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

rude tone, off-topic rants, strict tardiness and book rules, and is doable if you show up and complete everything.

Main concern

Rudeness, nitpicky penalties, and weak teaching of the actual material.

What students said

“ . I got kicked out for not having my book.”
ENG001
“She should be teaching high school because she's immature.”
80648
“if you show up at 6:01 (one minute after class starts) She .”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online review says class time was wasted on personal life stories rather than grammar and writing.

Main concern

Feels like a time-waster with little academic content.

What students said

“She was a time waster for me as I believe that English classes should be taken to learn more about grammarwriting, and not personal life stories.”
80653

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essays, quizzes, and .

EssaysQuizzesReading responsesDeadline-strict submissions

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and zero-for-late work rather than proctored exam formats.

EssaysQuizzesZero for late work
“If your work is late by a second (and yes, she counts) you get a 0!”
ENGL001
“The . The quizzes are easy. but the .”
81400

Online

.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting teaching, grading, and classroom climate themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

😤 Teaching Quality

28/100

“THE ENTIRE LIFE!! K-12 AND COLLEGE.”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“ !”

⚖️

22/100

“ and she is impossible to please.”

🗣️ Class Time Use

25/100

“All she did was sit there and make us listen to her random rants and stories.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she mostly wanders off topic and begins
  • Did more discussing random topics then focusing on teaching
  • She likes to hear

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • the
  • If your work is late by a second (and yes, she counts) you get a 0!
  • Juarez is an amazingly easy teacher, as long as you pay attention and do the work

Theme 3

💔 About Classroom Climate

  • She is unnecessarily rude and completely crazy!
  • she talks down to students and is ridiculous about the smallest things
  • I felt like I was in high school

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews over many years give a consistent negative tone, but grades and and most comments are older.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ENG0013 reviews
ENG13 reviews
ENGL0013 reviews
806532 reviews
806481 review
Show 8 more courses
814001 review
ENG0041 review
ENG0111 review
ENG21 review
ENGLI10651 review
ENGLI21 review
ENGLIE0011 review
ENGWR3001 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

4

B 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1