AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Andrew Bloom

MATH030 · MATH20 · MATH30 · CALCU30 · MATH104 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you will do the work and use labs; if you need a pure easy A with zero grind.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesTests match materialHelpful labsJournal workloadMakes math relatable
  • Most students call him an outstanding math teacher who brings clarity and care.
  • Homework, labs, and but prep you well for .
  • A minority warn of fast pace and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

As are common when you pay attention, do homework and projects, though .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content ranges from easy-with-help calc to fast, hard math30 depending on section and student background.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Several reviews mark attendance mandatory and .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

and care despite one cautionary review.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Many find tests fair and homework-aligned; one student says he grades hard with tricky tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Journals, projects, labs, and but .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

, and willingness to slow down define most reviews.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of homework, labs, journals or projects, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person math and calculus with , and tests usually tied to what he teaches.

Main concern

Workload from journals or and tricky exams.

What students said

“Mr. Bloom makes it relatable, understandable, and even interesting.”
104
“ , as long as you do your homework you will find out that it is easier to get an A on the tests.”
MATH20
“ and oftentimes not in relation to what was learned or on the hw.”
MATH30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and homework; labs and projects help, though some call tests tricky or mismatched.

Lecture-based testsLabs help on testsProjects for reviewSometimes tricky exams

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Tests generally follow what he teaches and labs; a .

Lecture-aligned testsLab practiceProjects as review
“ SO DIFFICULT SINCE HE BASES THEM ON WHAT HE TEACHES.”
MATH104
“be there for !”
MATH30
“ and oftentimes not in relation to what was learned or on the hw.”
MATH30

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews, highlighting clarity, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“The lectures brought complete clarity to the subject.”

👍 Recommendation

88/100

“ !”

📝 Workload Tradeoff

48/100

“EVEN THOUGH HE REQUIRES TO DO A JOURNAL WHICH TAKES A LOT OF TIME, IT DOES HELP.”

⚖️

58/100

“ , as long as you do your homework you will find out that it is easier to get an A on the tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • thoughtful with
  • makes it relatable, understandable, and even interesting
  • always willing to answer questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you wanna to get "A" all you have to do is to pay attention
  • !!

Theme 3

❤️

  • Really cares and if you have any issues hes always happy to slow down
  • be there for !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven mostly detailed reviews from 2008-2016 with strong consistency on teaching quality; age of comments reduces score.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH304 reviews
MATH1042 reviews
MATH202 reviews
1041 review
CALCU301 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH0301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values