AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Robert Scott

MATH014 · MATH011 · MATH11 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless you can fully teach yourself; recent reviews describe a hostile, hard-to-pass math class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProImpossible TestsCondescendingUnclear LecturesOff-Topic RantsAvoid
  • Recent students call tests nearly impossible and .
  • Multiple reports of condescending tone and .
  • Older reviews were kinder, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Students report , and grades as low as F and D+ despite prior strong records.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Difficulty ratings sit near the top and students say lectures and problem directions are .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Multiple reviews state attendance was mandatory with .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Recent comments call him among the and one student failed only with him, outweighing older praise.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Tests are described as impossible and lost points.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

Complaints center on failed tests and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students cite unclear directions, no office hours, off-topic talk about personal business, and feeling dumb when asking questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and failed exams more than homework or projects.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math sections draw sharp criticism for , and a condescending classroom tone, with a few older positive notes.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“He makes tests impossible to pass. Classwork is him doing problems and .”
MATH014
“He was condescending and created a VERY uncomfortable learning environment.”
MATH011
“The only class I failed was by him out of 57 units and I've never had anything lower than a B.”
MATH11

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are repeatedly called impossible to pass with .

Hard In-Person TestsUnclear GradingHigh Failure Risk

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as extremely hard with .

Hard TestsOpaque Scoring
“ .”
MATH014
“Didn't have a lost points on my test when I approached him to see how to improve)”
MATH011

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Robert or Bob as he likes to be referred as is by far one of the . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews spanning 2007-2015, highlighting teaching, exams, and climate. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Didn't plan for lectures or have office hours. Really scattered info. made it hard to understand.”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“ . I have a 3.4 cumulative because of him.”

📝

18/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is constantly taking about his pool business and his house on Hawaii
  • Really scattered info. made it hard to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The only class I failed was by him out of 57 units
  • Didn't have a

Theme 3

💔 About Classroom Climate

  • condescending and created a VERY uncomfortable learning environment
  • Every time you ask anything he makes you feel dumb.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews span 2007-2015 with detailed negatives later and older positives; small sample and age lower confidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH113 reviews
MATH0111 review
MATH0141 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1