AI Rate Professor

Auto Body

Daniel Ulrich

AUTB101 · AUTO103 · AUTOBODY · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Solid pick if you already know the basics and want workplace skills, but skip if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProWorkplace ReadyHands-On ExpertiseDoes Not Hand-HoldPlays FavoritesCondescending at Times
  • Strong trade knowledge that prepares students for real auto body work
  • Rewards initiative but has little patience for beginners needing extra help
  • Mixed reputation with favorites versus students who struggle

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Grades land around B+ to C with real skill work required; initiative helps but favorites matter.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Difficulty ratings are modest overall, though trade skills still demand focus and practice.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as hands-on shop class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Two strong endorsements for workplace prep clash with one report of favoritism and condescension.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Reported grades range from B+ to C with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Practical shop work and skill practice; not described as homework-heavy.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Deep trade expertise and strong workplace prep, undercut by patience and favoritism complaints.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Emphasis on hands-on auto body work and practical skills rather than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Hands-on auto body instruction with strong industry knowledge; .

Main concern

Can be condescending and favor experienced students over .

What students said

“Dan is good to learn from, he has the ability and knowledge to do just about anything.”
AUTO103
“He is not the type of instructor who will hold your hand but if you show initiative and work hard will help you out.”
AUTOBODY
“Mr. Ularich can be condescending and inconsistent depending on whether or not you are one of his "in crowd".”
AUTB101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mr. Urlich prepares students to leave the classroom and step into the workplace.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting workplace prep versus favoritism concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

🔧 Trade Expertise

68/100

“In his expertise within this profession you can learn a lifetime of skills, ablilities as well as tricks of the trade.”

🚶 Self-Starter Culture

70/100

“He is not the type of instructor who will hold your hand but if you show initiative and work hard will help you out.”

⚠️ Favoritism Risk

35/100

“The students who may already have previous experience and can make him look good are are his favorites.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dan is good to learn from, he has the ability and knowledge to do just about anything.
  • One of the .
  • be prepared to be treated more like an employee and less like a student.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Great course, learned alot and did a lot of great work.
  • If .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three old reviews with mixed views and limited grade detail reduce confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AUTB1011 review
AUTO1031 review
AUTOBODY1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values