AI Rate Professor

English

Jim Long

ENG62 · ENG001 · ENGLISH4 · ENGLISH062 · ENGLI370 · ENGL001 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you , and frustrating organization.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear expectationsHarsh graderUnorganizedWeekend due datesPicky feedback
  • Low average quality (~2.0) with multiple 1s and almost no strong praise
  • Students , and weekend deadlines
  • A minority defend him as knowledgeable if you earn the grade; most advise avoiding

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

He grades like law school, demands perfection, and will not give a decent grade unless fully earned.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

High difficulty ratings and heavy paper standards make the course intellectually and logistically hard.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as mandatory in several reviews; no flexibility highlighted.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students ; only a few mild or defensive comments.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Described as , and criticism in front of classmates.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and redo culture create heavy ongoing load.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Common themes are unclear instructions, forgetfulness, disorganization, and weak English teaching.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and written assignments rather than balanced exams.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English with strict standards, , and frequent complaints of disorganization.

Main concern

, and high dropout-style frustration.

What students said

“ ”
ENG62
“ ”
062
“He was the and unclear teacher I have ever had at solano”
ENGLISH4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and frequent redos; exam format is rarely described in detail.

Harsh paper gradingAutomatic redosUnclear rubrics

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as extremely strict with automatic redos; few details on formal exams.

Harsh essay gradingAutomatic redosUnclear criteria
“Grades papers as if your at the Harvard School of Law, and by the ”
ENGLISH4
“He wants everything all perfect and if you don't do it in a certain way he criticizes you”
ENG001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He was the and unclear teacher I have ever had at solano.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 , and recommendation themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“The and is forgetful with names and assignments he gives out.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“ .”

⚖️

18/100

“Grades papers as if your at the Harvard School of Law, and by the .”

📋 Clarity Issues

25/100

“ . Many of my class mates had to ask clarifications through emails”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and unclear
  • Doesnt know the first thing about English
  • challenged students before even knowing what they were going to say

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he just wont give you a decent grade if you don't earn it
  • make sure you know

Theme 3

📅 About Workload & Deadlines

  • make

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews spanning 2004–2015 with consistent negative themes; sample is modest but opinions align strongly.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

0622 reviews
ENGLISH42 reviews
ENG0011 review
ENG621 review
ENGL0011 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGLI3701 review
ENGLISH0621 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values