AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Elizabeth Osborne

ACCT50 · ACCT050 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Expect mixed clarity; if you can teach yourself accounting, the A is attainable, but .

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed teaching clarityLaid-back paceSelf-taught A possibleHelpful one-on-oneUnclear lectures
  • Only two older reviews, and they sharply disagree on teaching quality.
  • One student felt completely lost yet still earned an A .
  • The other found , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

One student got an A despite understanding almost nothing, suggesting grades are obtainable even with weak lecture grasp.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-range; content confuses some but is manageable at your own pace for others.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; another says she is not really a teacher, so recommendation splits.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

An A was earned even when the student felt completely lost, pointing to forgiving outcomes.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

70/100

Half lecture and software study problems at your own pace; no heavy load is described.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Reviews split between lost and and great individual assistance.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Study problems on software and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one says nobody understood her lectures yet still got an A; the other praises laid-back pacing and individual help.

Main concern

Lecture clarity may be poor, so students who need structure can feel lost.

What students said

“She really isn't a teacher. No one had any idea what she was talking about.”
ACCT50
“Very laid back and let's you work at your own pace.”
ACCT050

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; work is described as lecture plus software study problems.

Software study problemsSelf-paced work

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize lecture and software study problems; .

Software study problems
“First half of class is lecture followed by study problems on software program.”
ACCT050

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She really isn't a teacher. No one had any idea what she was talking about. We were all lost. But - got the A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting in-person reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

❓ Teaching Clarity

45/100

“She really isn't a teacher. No one had any idea what she was talking about.”

🅰️ Still Got the A

78/100

“But - got the A. I took the class for personal interest.”

👍 Laid-back Help

70/100

“She helps each individual that needs assistance. She's great.”

Theme 1

📚 About Learning Experience

  • We were all lost.
  • In the end I suppose I learned a little. But it was my own doing.
  • .

Theme 2

🧘 About Pace & Style

  • Very laid back and let's you work at your own pace.
  • First half of class is lecture followed by study problems on software program.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting reviews from 2012 and 2015 with limited detail make conclusions unreliable.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCT0501 review
ACCT501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values