AI Rate Professor

English

Larissa Jaurez

ENG001 · ENG1 · ENGL001 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you want a tough, unpleasant English experience and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh essay graderTreats adults like kidsPolarizing English teacherUnapproachableChallenging research papers
  • Many students call her rude, unapproachable, and treat adults like middle-schoolers.
  • Essay and as hard and inconsistent.
  • A minority still say they learned a lot and found the class interesting despite difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Good essay grades are hard to get; feels easy.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Lots of essay writing and new research topics make the work harder than many expect.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

At least one review states attendance was mandatory, with a generally strict classroom tone.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and rude-teacher complaints outweigh the minority who learned a lot.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students say she is ridiculously hard and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Heavy essay and research-paper load with challenging topics dominates the course.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Common themes are rude, unapproachable, and middle-school treatment, with only a few positive teaching notes.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Essays and a .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English 001 sections polarize: several call her the , and do-not-take; a few praise challenge and .

Main concern

Rude tone, harsh inconsistent grading, and .

What students said

“ . Rude and disrespectful to students.”
ENGL001
“DO. NOT. TAKE. THIS. CLASS!!!!!!!!!!”
ENG001
“She taught me a lot and although the class was harder than I expected, I enjoyed the class.”
ENG001

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and research papers; .

Essay-heavyResearch paper

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a research paper rather than proctored exams.

Essay writingResearch paper
“You do a lot of essay writing. The research paper and me.”
ENG001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Rude and disrespectful to students. She is ridiculously hard in grading and inconsistent. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person English reviews with strong negative clustering. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

28/100

“DO. NOT. TAKE. THIS. CLASS!!!!!!!!!!”

⚖️

22/100

“She is ridiculously hard in grading and inconsistent.”

😠 Classroom Tone

30/100

“She treated us like we were in middle school.”

📚 Some Still Learned

70/100

“She taught me a lot and although the class was harder than I expected, I enjoyed the class.”

Theme 1

😠 About Personality

  • Nice as a person , awful as a teacher!
  • She was very unapproachable.
  • Rude and disrespectful to students.

Theme 2

📝 About Writing Load

  • You do a lot of essay writing.
  • .
  • I still managed to get a B because the class was easy, she just made it a very unpleasant experience.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews are mixed but repeatedly stress harsh personality and ; sample is small and older.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG0013 reviews
0011 review
ENG11 review
ENGL0011 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1