AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Thomas Warren

PHILO1 · PHIL001 · MORALPHIL · PHIL04 · PHIL006 · PLSC6 · INTROTOPHIL · PHIL1 · POLSC6 · PHLOS4 · PHIL003 · PHILO3 · POLYS6 · PHLOS3 · PHIL3 · PHLOS5 · PHILO001 · PHILPHIL · PHIL4 · 78 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

if you want a and can protect your GPA elsewhere.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderDaily QuizzesCritical Reading HeavyUnclear LecturesGPA Killer
  • Extremely hard to earn high grades; many report C or below even with effort.
  • Daily reading quizzes and tough papers dominate the course.
  • Strong critical thinkers may grow, but most students leave frustrated and warn others away.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

20/100

Students repeatedly say almost no one gets an A and that hard work often yields only a C.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Heavy critical reading before class plus abstract philosophy make the content intellectually demanding.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and tardies counted as absences.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students because of and unclear teaching.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students call him a strong effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

constant heavy load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

, and frustration, though a few credit real intellectual growth.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

and essays more than a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

quizzes, and strict papers; many students find lectures unclear and personality abrasive while a minority praise intellectual growth.

Main concern

Harsh grading and .

What students said

“ . nobody can get an A. not even 4.0 students.”
PHIL1
“ !!!”
PHIL003
“It's not an easy A class. You'll have to do a lot of reading, writing and thinking.”
PLSC6

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on frequent reading quizzes and exam model.

Daily QuizzesReading-Based QuizzesEssay Papers

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

essay requirements.

Daily QuizzesPre-Lecture QuizzesEssays
“There is a and .”
PHIL001
“ ! ... yet been discussed.”
PHIL3

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“do not take this class !”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews spanning 2006-2014, highlighting harsh grading and mixed intellectual value. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ . Grades inaccurately. Poor communication skills. Stay away at all costs”

🚫 Recommendation

28/100

“Warren is by far the . Do yourself a favor and .”

⚖️

22/100

“Its impossible to get an A. No one in our class got an A or even a B for that matter.”

📚 Workload & Quizzes

35/100

“There is a and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and confusing.
  • He rambles on and on about stuff not related to philosophy
  • he fails to teach with the s. method.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Don't expect an easy A if you don't read critically.
  • Ended up with a C but i had to work for that C.
  • Expect to get a C at most.. not a class for those who like their GPA

Theme 3

😤 About Classroom Climate

  • Always tries to humiliate people which is incredibly annoying!
  • Very arrogant & argumentive if you don't agree with his opinions.
  • I walk into class happy and leave upset every single day.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

78

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed in-person reviews spanning many years show consistent themes on difficulty and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 512
3 out of 56
2 out of 525
1 out of 526

Course coverage

PHIL00310 reviews
PHIL39 reviews
PHIL0018 reviews
PHIL14 reviews
PHILO33 reviews
Show 14 more courses
PHILO12 reviews
POLSC62 reviews
INTROTOPHIL1 review
MORALPHIL1 review
PHIL0061 review
PHIL041 review
PHIL41 review
PHILO0011 review
PHILPHIL1 review
PHLOS31 review
PHLOS41 review
PHLOS51 review
PLSC61 review
POLYS61 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values