AI Rate Professor

Speech

Angela Ehle-Beasley

COMM001 · SPCH001 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; students report and a hostile classroom climate.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnfair GraderIntimidatingPlays FavoritesSpeech BiasAvoid
  • Both reviews call her one of the
  • as biased toward favorites rather than speech quality
  • Covers research methods more than practical speaking skills students want

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Flawless speeches can still get lower grades while weaker ones get praise, so an A feels arbitrary.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Difficulty is rated 5 with stress from fear, bias, and heavy research focus over speaking craft.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

available reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and call her among the .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students report and rewards favorites.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

Workload includes speeches plus heavy research methods rather than pure presentation practice.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Described as terrifying, abrasive, and failing to teach core speaking skills students need.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment centers on graded speeches with substantial research-method content.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Students describe harsh bias, intimidation, and .

Main concern

Perceived favoritism and abrasive demeanor destroy trust in feedback and grades.

What students said

“One of the ! She gave accolades to students who messed up their speeches, but gave lower grades to the ones who had flawless speeches.”
COMM001
“She terrifies her students, she's abrasive and intimidating.”
SPCH001

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and bias rather than traditional exams or proctoring tools.

Graded speeches

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evaluation is speech performance with claimed favoritism; .

In-class speechesResearch methods focus
“She gave accolades to students who messed up their speeches, but gave lower grades to the ones who had flawless speeches.”
COMM001
“she covers little material that actually make you a better speaker... and instead spends too much time on research methods!”
SPCH001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the ! She gave accolades to students who messed up their speeches, but gave lower grades to the ones who had flawless speeches. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 strongly negative in-person speech reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

10/100

“One of the . She terrifies her students, she's abrasive and intimidating.”

⚖️

10/100

“She gave accolades to students who messed up their speeches, but gave lower grades to the ones who had flawless speeches.”

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She terrifies her students, she's abrasive and intimidating
  • covers little material that actually make you a better speaker
  • spends too much time on research methods

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • gave lower grades to the ones who had flawless speeches
  • holds bias and shows favorites among her students
  • One of the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only two strongly negative reviews years apart; consistent tone but very small sample limits confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

COMM0011 review
SPCH0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values