AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Silke Schulz

SOC2 · SOC002 · SOCIOLOGY002 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you have no alternative and can tolerate harsh critique with little teaching support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh essay gradingExplains nothingBoring lecturesCritical and argumentativeAvoid if possible
  • Students call her terrible, critical, and unhelpful in sociology.
  • as harsh with little learning payoff.
  • Complaints include boring class, bad textbook, and even dean-level issues.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

and little guidance make a high grade feel costly and uncertain.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students say the class is , uninteresting, and poorly explained.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, though Facebook participation is required in at least one section.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Every review is , and classroom climate.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly call her super critical on essays and assignments.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Work centers on essays, textbook, and required Facebook participation rather than a huge volume of tasks.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students say , and made sociology uninteresting.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments focus on essay critique and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person , and an uninteresting class climate.

Main concern

Harsh critique of .

What students said

“Terrible, terrible professor! She was awful, so ...”
SOC2
“ and is super critical .”
SOC002
“Requires Facebook participation which should be left to online learning..critical of assignments.”
SOCIOLOGY002

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but do not clearly describe proctoring or .

Essay-heavy critiqueUnclear exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize .

Critical essay gradingFacebook participation required
“so ... negative and argumentative.”
SOC2
“Requires Facebook participation which should be left to online learning..critical of assignments.”
SOCIOLOGY002

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Terrible, terrible professor! She was awful, so ...”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting harsh critique and weak teaching. Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Disaster

15/100

“ and is super critical .”

⚖️

12/100

“so ... negative and argumentative.”

👎 Low Recommendation

12/100

“I learned nothing about sociology and it's dissappoinong bc I'm a soc major”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She made sociology class uninteresting.
  • Super boring And hard to understand what's going on
  • Students were not given opportunity to voice opinions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • super critical
  • critical of assignments.
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • negative and argumentative.
  • Students have complained to the dean even.
  • Requires Facebook participation which should be left to online learning

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

; they are consistent but the sample is too small for high confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

SOC0021 review
SOC21 review
SOCIOLOGY0021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values