AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Glenn Gaviglio

SOC001 · SOSCI22 · SOC1033 · SOCIO001 · SOC1 · SOCIO1 · SOCSC22 · SOC01 · SOCIO6053 · SOCPROBS · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you will do the weekly work and ; watch for late grade cuts.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGrade Reduction TrapExtra Credit HeavyThought-Provoking DiscussionsMixed OrganizationSimple Multiple-Choice Tests
  • is common but several students report a surprise end-of-term grade reduction that .
  • Doing the weekly reading and following guidelines is required; and you will not pass easily.
  • some call him knowledgeable and and confusing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Doing readings and work usually earns a solid grade, but surprise end-term grade cuts can erase an A.

Nearly ; the lone online review only calls him a .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

and discussion-based work, though weekly reading is required.

and interesting forums; one online review rated difficulty very high.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , so flexibility is unclear.

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students either praise knowledge and easy tests or and confusion.

Recommendation ; online evidence is too thin to compare.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

helps, but multiple reports of late grade reductions make grading feel unpredictable.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Weekly reading, discussions, and assignments add up; not light if .

Format shift

Workload comments are almost entirely from in-person and hybrid-era reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and insightful; others say lectures wander and do not match tests.

Format shift

Positive organization notes appear in both formats; confusion is also reported online and in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of , and occasional review sessions.

Format shift

and reviews most clearly.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person and hybrid-style comments split between easy grades with , and warnings about grade reductions and .

Main concern

End-of-term grade reduction and .

What students said

“Prof G. gives alot of but beware..of a grade reduction at the end. I went from a A to C.”
SOC1033
“Definitely not an easy class to pass without doing any of the work.”
SOC01
“ , and his review sessions are the best!!”
SOC1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single old online review calls him confusing and a .

Main concern

Unclear expectations and .

What students said

“ .”
SOC001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are often described as simple multiple choice with .

Multiple Choice TestsReview SessionsSimple Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and strong review sessions before exams.

Multiple Choice TestsReview SessionsSimple Tests
“ , and his review sessions are the best!!”
SOC1
“ .”
SOCSC22

Online

.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof G. gives alot of but beware..of a grade reduction at the end. I went from a A to C.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews spanning 2003-2013, highlighting grading traps, workload, and mixed teaching praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️ Grade Surprise Risk

42/100

“Prof G. gives alot of but beware..of a grade reduction at the end. I went from a A to C.”

📚 Work Required for Grade

55/100

“Definitely not an easy class to pass without doing any of the work.”

🧪

62/100

“ , and his review sessions are the best!!”

🧠 Thought-Provoking Forums

70/100

“the online class.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I went from a A to C.
  • if you do the work you'll get a good grade.
  • It's easy to get a good grade but you have to actually read and follow the his guidelines.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and easy to follow.
  • His lectures don't even corrolate with the study guide and test
  • Excellent Professor. VERY knowledgeable.

Theme 3

💬 About Class Vibe

  • cracked jokes constantly
  • discussions always stray off course
  • fun learning, Professor Glenn is your guy!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen mostly older reviews (2003-2013) with mixed but detailed comments; consistency is .

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

SOCIO13 reviews
SOC0012 reviews
SOC12 reviews
SOC011 review
SOC10331 review
Show 5 more courses
SOCIO0011 review
SOCIO60531 review
SOCPROBS1 review
SOCSC221 review
SOSCI221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values