AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

Rachelle Jackson

COUN62 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Possible solid pick for a light course, but one review is not enough to trust strongly.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGood InstructorNeeds Professionalism PracticeLow DifficultyLimited Reviews
  • Only one review exists, so insight is thin.
  • Student found her generally good with very low difficulty.
  • Main critique is limited professionalism in teaching practice.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Difficulty is rated very low, but no grade outcomes or A-effort details are given.

.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

The sole review rates difficulty at the bottom end of the scale.

Ease .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

The one student views her as a good instructor with only a mild professionalism caveat.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

, but evidence is too thin to claim generosity.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

Low difficulty rating implies a .

Format shift

Inferred only from the one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Called a good instructor who still needs more professionalism practice.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not describe the mix of exams versus assignments.

Format shift

No assessment breakdown in the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

low course difficulty.

Main concern

Student notes she may need more practice teaching professionalism.

What students said

“Overall I think she was a good instructor. May need more practice teaching professionalism though.”
COUN62

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall I think she was a good instructor. May need more practice teaching professionalism though.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting generally good instruction with a professionalism caveat. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Overall I think she was a good instructor.”

🛠️ Growth Area

55/100

“May need more practice teaching professionalism though.”

📘 Low Difficulty

85/100

“Course DIFFICULTY rating: 1”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she was a good instructor
  • May need more practice teaching professionalism though

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 1

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one short 2012 review with no grades, tags, or second opinions.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COUN621 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values