AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

Alison Aubert

ATL100 · ATHL10 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Great low-stress PE pick if you want a , but evidence is thin and outdated.

Best fit · Easy A HunterSweet and helpfulVery easy PE classTake this classHigh quality ratings
  • Both reviews give perfect quality scores with low difficulty
  • Students call her sweet, helpful, and awesome
  • Only two very short old reviews with almost no course detail

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Difficulty ratings are low and students push others to take the class with no mention of .

.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Physical education and athletics classes were rated easy with almost no academic struggle reported.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Both reviewers rate her a 5 and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and difficulty is low, suggesting easy outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Comments never mention heavy work and the courses feel low-load PE electives.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students call her awesome, sweet, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

and exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Students describe her as awesome, sweet, and and athletics classes.

Main concern

Reviews are extremely short and from 2010-2012 with .

What students said

“Awsome teacher!! Sweet, and very helpful! Take this class!”
ATHL10
“Awesome”
ATL100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Awsome teacher!! Sweet, and very helpful! Take this class!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting warmth and ease. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“Awsome teacher!! Sweet, and very helpful! Take this class!”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“Take this class!”

😌 Ease

88/100

“Awesome”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • Sweet, and very helpful!
  • Awesome

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Take this class!
  • Awesome

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two extremely short reviews from 2010-2012 with no grades, tags, or detailed course logistics.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ATHL101 review
ATL1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values