AI Rate Professor

History

Richard Bunch

PHLOS32 · HISTORY5 · HIST5 · PHIL31 · PHIL32 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you will do the reading and participate; you will learn a lot, but it is not an easy ride.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTons of readingParticipation mattersExtra credit availableBrilliant but hardSweet professor
  • and participation strongly affect success
  • He is kind, knowledgeable, and
  • and helps

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

An A is reachable with reading, participation, and , but many students call him hard.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Students repeatedly report a ton of reading and a class that .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Participation counts a lot and students urge you to show up and get involved.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend him because they learn a lot from a brilliant, caring professor.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Standards feel high and , though softens the hit.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Almost every review stresses lots of , and steady work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

He loves the subject and students learn a lot, though lectures can feel dry or slow.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and tests with essays.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person history and philosophy students call him brilliant and sweet, but , and .

Main concern

and occasional test-review mismatches.

What students said

“Pretty easy class if you do the work. Participation is important as well as doing the assigned reading.”
PHLOS32
“He is hard but I learned A LOT!”
HISTORY5
“He is such a sweet guy, but way too difficult.”
HIST5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests often mix scantron questions with an essay and can feel tough if .

Scantron T/F and multiple choiceEssay from readingExtra credit quizzesReview sessions

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests as .

Scantron T/F and multiple choiceEssay from readingExtra credit quizzes
“ and multiple choice and one essay.”
PHIL32
“the reading.”
HISTORY5

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is hard but I learned A LOT!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting reading load, participation, and tough rewarding teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Brilliant Prof, actually has published a few things, including books and poems.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“This class involves a TON of reading”

👍 Recommendation

76/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he makes it obvious that he loves what he does.
  • he has the kind of voice that .
  • Brilliant Prof

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class involves a TON of reading
  • Pretty easy class if you do the work.
  • He is hard but I learned A LOT!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He is such a sweet guy
  • a

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews from 2005-2012 , and tough but rewarding classes.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST52 reviews
PHIL322 reviews
HISTORY51 review
PHIL311 review
PHLOS321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values