AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jim Mumaugh

MAT51 · MATH104 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

unless you already know the material and can handle harsh, inflexible teaching.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRude and BelittlingDoes Not ExplainHis Way OnlyMandatory AttendanceNear Impossible A
  • Students repeatedly call him rude, belittling, and .
  • , and mandatory attendance pile on pressure.
  • Many say it is nearly impossible to get an A and advise avoiding him entirely.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students say an A is practically impossible with , and .

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Tons of word problems, little teaching, and rigid methods make the content very hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

and missing class hurts because .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Most students explicitly say stay away due to rudeness and poor teaching.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

, and textbook methods marked wrong.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students , and lectures make little sense.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Daily HW and ; HW is 20 percent and exams dominate risk.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Harsh in-person math classes with , and high failure risk.

Main concern

Rude tone, , and nearly impossible A.

What students said

“ ! Terrible, unpleasant and rude!”
MATH104
“It's practically impossible to get an A. . .”
MATH104
“HE DOESNT ALLOW YOU TO USE A CALCULATOR SO THEN IT TAKES TIME DURING A EXAM. .”
MATH104

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and little time to finish.

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and timed with no calculator allowed; content is predictable for some but still brutal.

No CalculatorTimed ExamsHard TestsDaily HW and Quizzes
“HE DOESNT ALLOW YOU TO USE A CALCULATOR SO THEN IT TAKES TIME DURING A EXAM.”
MATH104
“ . Only about 10 people stuck out the whole class, and still only 5 people passed.”
MATH104
“ .You know exactly what the test will consist of. .”
MAT51

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! Terrible, unpleasant and rude! He hates it when people ask questions and makes a mockery of you if you don't understand the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews, highlighting rudeness and harsh difficulty. Credibility rating: High.

💥 Teaching Disaster

18/100

“HE'S A HORRIBLE TEACHER DONT DO THE MISTAKE I DID I GOT STUCK WITH AND ”

🚫

12/100

“Stay away from his class! He is insane with that he expects! It's practically impossible to get an A.”

⚖️

15/100

“If textbook method is used, our answers are marked wrong; seems that he wants us to fail.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesnt make any sense when lecturing class.
  • Out of a three hour class, we usually have 20 minutes of instruction.

Theme 2

😠 About Character

  • HES VERY RUDE.
  • makes a mockery of you if you don't understand
  • He belittles his students for

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's practically impossible to get an A.
  • . .
  • he doesnt teach the stuff,expects u 2 know it so plan to get a tutor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Ten mostly consistent negative in-person reviews from 2006-2012 with , and exams.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH1049 reviews
MAT511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values