AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Ann Willer

FLASHCOM · XML72 · XML062 · CIS62 · CIS15 · CIS061 · CIS111 · CIS8086 · CIS71 · CIS015 · CIS1562 · CIS1 · CIS61 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if you need guidance; if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnhelpfulTeach YourselfRude ResponsesHeavy WorkloadIt's In The Book
  • Most and report little teaching support.
  • Workload is heavy with projects, quizzes, and .
  • Answers often reduce to the book, with and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Picky rubrics, long timed program tests, and can be learned alone.

; some comments mention online sections but counts treat them as in person.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

CIS coding , and strict project details.

All difficulty evidence is from the in-person review set.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; online discussion post rules were strict when mentioned.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The dominant message is do not take her, with only a few notes that you can learn if self-directed.

Recommendation tone .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Students report and buttons, ambiguous quiz items, and little credit for instructor mistakes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Weekly quizzes, multiple projects, discussion posts, and .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Repeated reports of no help, it's in the , and .

Format shift

Teaching quality judgments are based on the full in-person set.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of projects, discussions, weekly quizzes, and high-stakes timed programming tests.

Format shift

Assessment mix described only in in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Students describe minimal teaching, heavy projects and , and many explicit do-not-take warnings.

Main concern

Little instructional help, picky rubrics, and high .

What students said

“ . Wanted to learn this class and she never would help.”
FLASHCOM
“Do not walk but RUN away! I'm an A student (but not with her class) and have never come across an instructor that gives absolutly NO help!”
XML72
“If you are .”
CIS15

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

pressure with picky grading; proctoring details are not clearly described.

Timed Programming TestsWeekly QuizzesStrict Rubrics

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students describe challenging timed tests and quizzes with ambiguous items and .

4-Hour Program TestsWeekly QuizzesAmbiguous Quiz Items
“The in 4 hrs. You must learn to code fast”
CIS15
“a 4-hour test, in and several projects.”
CIS015

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do not walk but RUN away! I'm an A student (but not with her class) and have never come across an instructor that gives absolutly NO help!”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 in-person reviews spanning 2006-2012, with strong negative consistency. Credibility rating: High.

🚫

15/100

“ . She is HORRIBLE.”

📚 Teach Yourself Required

18/100

“If you are .”

⏱️

22/100

“The in 4 hrs.”

💬 No Help Culture

18/100

“Her answer to every question is "its in the book".”

Theme 1

🏃

  • . She is HORRIBLE.
  • Run away fast. Find a better teacher for flash.
  • .

Theme 2

📖 Teaching Style

  • It's in the book
  • She doesn't answer questions.
  • minimal teaching and maximum book use

Theme 3

📝 Workload And Grading

  • write an entire program in 4 hrs
  • requires at least three
  • not a pushover at alllllll!!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen detailed reviews over several years show highly consistent negative themes on help, workload, and tone.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 55
1 out of 511

Course coverage

CIS616 reviews
CIS152 reviews
CIS0151 review
CIS0611 review
CIS11 review
Show 8 more courses
CIS1111 review
CIS15621 review
CIS621 review
CIS711 review
CIS80861 review
FLASHCOM1 review
XML0621 review
XML721 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values