AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Candice Simonds

SOC1 · SOCIO1 · SOC40 · SOC001 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.4

The decision

Great low-effort sociology option if you want an easy term; not ideal if you want rigorous content.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery easyMinimal workParticipation focusedSparks interestJournal assignments
  • Most students call the class really easy with .
  • Main asks are show up, participate, keep a short journal, and do a .
  • One outlier says you learn nothing and and class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

85/100

Multiple students report almost no work beyond participation, a journal, and a presentation.

.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Consistently described as very easy summer or intro sociology with minimal assignments.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

Participation and showing up matter, but comments .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Most students say and she rocks; one student found zero learning value.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

85/100

and high quality ratings.

Format shift

.

Workload

Featherlight

90/100

Often one or and participation.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many call her amazing and interest-sparking; one says terrible if you want real learning.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades revolve around participation, journals, and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person sociology reviews mostly describe an easy, participation-light course that still sparks interest for some.

Main concern

Low learning depth for students who want rigor.

What students said

“it was really really easy. But at the same time, you learned alot.”
SOC001
“we pretty much only had 2 assignments the whole sem.”
SOCIO1
“Terrible teacher if you want to learn anything, dont waste your money on the book, or going to class.”
SOC40

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is light and .

Final presentationJournal entriesParticipation

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections emphasize participation, a journal, and a .

Final presentationJournal assignmentParticipation required
“there is really no work involved except showing up to class and doing the !”
SOC001
“ and thats to keep a journal of 20 entries”
SOCIO1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If u can.. !!!! She rocks!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews focused on ease, light work, and mixed learning value. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Spark

72/100

“She totally sparked my interest for sociology”

🍃 Workload

90/100

“we pretty much only had 2 assignments the whole sem.”

🅰️ Easy A Path

85/100

“it was really really easy.”

👎 Learning Depth

25/100

“Terrible teacher if you want to learn anything”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very easy teacher
  • really really easy
  • really no work involved except showing up

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • amazing teacher
  • sparked my interest for sociology
  • She rocks!
  • dont waste your money on the book, or going to class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

50/100

Evidence confidence

Five older reviews with strong ease consensus, but limited detail, one empty comment, and no grade distribution.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOCIO12 reviews
SOC0011 review
SOC11 review
SOC401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values