AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Dorothy Hawkes

MATH · MATH40 · MATH30 · MATH102 · MATH12 · MATH20 · MATH020 · MATH2 · MATH31 · MAT40 · MATH22 · MATH2021 · MATH104 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you are strong in math and will put in ; average students often struggle with clarity and grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPicky GraderHeavy HomeworkMixed ClarityLots of QuizzesStrict Classroom Rules
  • Reviews and students who felt lost
  • , and picky partial-point grading are common
  • Strict door and tardiness rules plus self-teaching demands frustrate many

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

An A and surviving picky grading on tiny mistakes.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Many students call the class hard, fast, and confusing unless you are already strong in math.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

She locks the door, dislikes tardiness, and does not like students leaving early.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

44/100

Some call her the best math teacher while , so fit depends on math readiness.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report and and tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of , and long practice needed to master tests.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Praise for clear step-by-step teaching is balanced by many reports of .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and comprehensive finals all matter.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some call her one of the best step-by-step teachers, while , and rigid classroom rules.

Main concern

and quizzes, and lectures that force self-teaching for average students.

What students said

“She was very straight forward and . and I learned a lot.”
MATH22
“she is very and is a very picky grader she takes off point for EVERY MINUTE mistake!”
MATH30
“Nice Lady, But cant teach. Trust me she doesn't need to be teaching math.”
MATH104

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests often resemble practice exams but still demand heavy mastery and can be comprehensive.

Practice tests similar to real testsFrequent quizzesComprehensive final

Assessment risk

Standard

46/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests similar to practice sets, with a comprehensive final for some courses.

Practice testsFrequent quizzesComprehensive final
“ , and are like the practice exams.”
MATH22
“She puts up practice tests that come very similar to the actual test... so comprehensive”
MATH40

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're good in math, you'll probably pass her class. If your average, expect to do a lot of self teaching to catch up.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 in-person reviews, highlighting , and heavy workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

48/100

“ and .”

⚖️

28/100

“she is a mistake!”

📚 Workload Intensity

24/100

“she puts a lot of lot of concepts and problems.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was very straight forward and
  • Nice Lady, But cant teach

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she is a
  • There is
  • Hard teacher - don't expect to pass her class if you're not math-inclined

Theme 3

🚪 About Classroom Rules

  • she doesnt like tardiness
  • she locked the door
  • Does not have patience for students who come to class unprepared

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

29 detailed reviews from 2003-2010 show a stable polarized pattern on teaching clarity, workload, and .

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 55
3 out of 56
2 out of 56
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH1049 reviews
MATH203 reviews
MATH223 reviews
MATH303 reviews
MATH1022 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH402 reviews
MAT401 review
MATH1 review
MATH0201 review
MATH121 review
MATH21 review
MATH20211 review
MATH311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values