AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Carol Leguennec

MATH304 · MATH1ST · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

; students report almost no teaching help or classroom management.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnhelpfulDisengagedNo Classroom ControlAvoidWaste of Time
  • Students call her unhelpful and disengaged during class time.
  • Multiple reviews say she takes smoking and coffee breaks instead of teaching.
  • Class control is weak and favoritism is alleged.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

; students stress zero help and poor class management, so an A .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Content difficulty varies by section, but the bigger issue is absence of useful teaching rather than hard material.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; one student calls class a waste of two hours.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students and call her teaching a waste of time.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Grading style is barely discussed; complaints focus on help and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is not a main theme; .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students , and loses class control.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe exams versus assignments; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

: little help, smoking breaks, weak discipline, and favoritism.

Main concern

No real instruction or classroom control; students feel ignored.

What students said

“ .”
MATH1ST
“shes horrible.she doesnt help you at all.”
MATH304
“She did not have control of the class however.”
MATH304

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or formats.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting disengagement and weak classroom control. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Quality

15/100

“I did NOT like this teacher. At ALL. .”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“ .”

☕ Disengagement

20/100

“all she does is drink coffee and then goes out for a smoking break.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • it's a waste of 2 hours to even go to her class.
  • she doesnt help you at all.

Theme 2

📉 About Classroom Control

  • She did not have control of the class however.
  • People were eating/talking/answering cell phones
  • she does favortiism.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three old reviews from 2005-2010 with consistent negativity but limited detail and no grade data.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH3042 reviews
MATH1ST1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values