AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Melissa Jeddeloh

CHEM001 · CHEM11 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Consider her if you want a nice, helpful chem teacher, but and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful and niceUnclear lectures at timesSlow grading feedbackHard testsLaid back personality
  • some say she makes hard chemistry clearer and
  • Others say lectures miss the , and
  • All five reviews are older in-person CHEM sections with no grade outcomes listed

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Tests are described as difficult and , so an A likely takes solid study time.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Chemistry content, fast chapter pace, and .

In-person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

; others hated the class despite liking chemistry itself.

Mixed in-person opinions only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Personality is laid back and late-accepting, but and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students report and worksheets with about 1.5 chapters per day.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Helpful and nice for some, but others say lectures never match the book and feel unprepared.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Hard tests with fill-in reactions matter a lot, while .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person CHEM001/CHEM11 students praise niceness and help but criticize lecture clarity, pace, and .

Main concern

and almost no graded feedback until final grades.

What students said

“she explained the material well and . She made the class much easier for me, but I still learned a lot.”
CHEM001
“She doesn't grade anything, so don't expect to know your grade until you get it in the mail.”
CHEM001
“ in the blank reactions.”
CHEM11

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as difficult with many fill-in-the-blank reactions; proctoring tools are not mentioned.

Difficult testsFill-in-the-blank reactionsLecture-test mismatch risk

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and can feel unclear relative to lectures.

Difficult testsFill-in-the-blank reactionsUnclear lecture alignment
“ in the blank reactions.”
CHEM11
“the tests were pretty difficult due to not being so .”
CHEM001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Chemistry is a hard subject for me, but she explained the material well and . She made the class much easier for me, but I still learned a lot.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person chemistry reviews, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Helpfulness

70/100

“she explained the material well and .”

🧪

35/100

“ in the blank reactions.”

📬

30/100

“She doesn't grade anything, so don't expect to know your grade until you get it in the mail.”

👍

65/100

“I wish she was teaching Chem 2; .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • explained the material well and
  • Lectures are straight out of the book sometimes word for word
  • Her lectures never match the book.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the tests were pretty difficult due to not being so
  • We covered 1.5 chapter per day and and work sheets due the following day

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • very nice and helpful teacher
  • laid back
  • nice easygoing teacher. Helpful and fun

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 reviews from mid-to-late 2009, all CHEM and and no reported grades.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM0014 reviews
CHEM111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values