AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Sanford Wright

PS1 · POLSC001 · PHSYC · PLSCI01 · POLSCI1 · POLI1 · POLSC1 · POLISCI1 · POLITICALSCI · POLYSCI1 · POLSCMWF · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you excel at pure memorization and a ; many students call him a hard pass.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVerbatim MemorizationInsulting Classroom ToneHeavy Research PaperPolarizing LecturerRetired
  • and lectures, which many call copy-machine learning.
  • A and is often described as long and hard-graded.
  • and fair if you work; critics say he is rude, rambling, and agenda-driven.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible if you memorize notes perfectly and nail a , but effort is high and many fail.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Material load, verbatim recall, and a than a gentle intro.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

, so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Low quality average and and rigor.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Verbatim exam answers and or personal wording.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students cite long research papers and dense memorization as the main grind.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Clarity for note-memorizers is real, but rudeness, rants, and humiliation dominate the overall tone.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grade split between verbatim tests and a the grade.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some get As by memorizing board notes and writing the paper, while many report humiliation, rants, and crushing workload.

Main concern

reports of insulting student treatment.

What students said

“ ”
POLSCMWF
“MEMORIZE THE NOTES (It's not that hard). ”
POLSC1
“ . UNLESS YOU WANT TO WRITE A 50 PAGE PAPER”
POLITICALSCI

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and lectures, paired with a high-stakes research paper.

Verbatim MemorizationBoard Notes TestsLong Research PaperNo Multiple Choice

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

plus a lengthy research paper.

Verbatim MemorizationBoard Notes TestsLong Research Paper
“HE GIVES YOU THE . MEMORIZE THE NOTES”
POLSC1
“he expects you to REWRITE EXACTLY what he wrote on the board for the test”
POLISCI1
“He requires a 35 page paper and grades it too hard”
PS1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 , and classroom climate. Credibility rating: High.

🧠 Memorize Or Fail

32/100

“ and textbook”

📄 Paper Pressure

22/100

“ . UNLESS YOU WANT TO WRITE A 50 PAGE PAPER”

👎 Classroom Tone

28/100

“Teacher was insulting, mean and enjoyed humilating his students”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He likes to ramble on and on about things not even related to the lecture material
  • This guy's got a lotta jokes
  • Rude, insulting,humiliates his students on a dialy basis

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Memorize the notes and you get an A
  • I got an "A"
  • Most students failed

Theme 3

📄

  • Half of your grade is from the research paper
  • essay quest
  • He requires a 35 page paper and grades it too hard

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews over several years show , and polarized personality, despite older dates.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 57

Course coverage

POLSC15 reviews
POLISCI14 reviews
POLSC0012 reviews
POLSCI12 reviews
POLYSCI12 reviews
Show 6 more courses
PHSYC1 review
PLSCI011 review
POLI11 review
POLITICALSCI1 review
POLSCMWF1 review
PS11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values