AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Younga Choi

MATH200 · MATH110120 · MA251 · MATH252 · 40680MATH811 · MATH811 · MATH120 · MATH130 · MATH110 · MATH251 · MATH225 · 115 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
34.38%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Skip if and fair grading; only consider if you can self-teach and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of homeworkFast lecturesTough graderUnclear explanationsLecture heavy
  • Most students call lectures too fast, unclear, or copied, with .
  • as harsh or opaque even when some still earn As.
  • A minority find her sweet and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

As and A+s appear, but students say harsh deductions and .

; in-person adds unfair-feeling test and assignment deductions.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Fast pacing, coding-heavy stats, and title.

Both formats call material when lectures fail.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and warn that missing lecture puts you behind.

Nearly all in-person and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

and the bulk of comments explicitly warn not to enroll.

A few in-person MATH200 fans recommend her; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

and complaints about point deductions dominate despite some high letter grades.

Format shift

; in-person stresses inconsistent deductions.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

Excessive weekly homework is the most repeated complaint across courses.

Format shift

; in-person volume complaints are the loudest.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

, though a minority find her caring or workable.

Format shift

Online videos get scorched; in-person is polarized but mostly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and occasional pop quizzes; .

Format shift

Online mentions note-allowed tests; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person majority describe fast unclear , and stress.

Main concern

Pace, unfair-feeling grading, and volume of .

What students said

“There is an overwhelming amount of homework, and the .”
MATH200
“The professor moves through lessons too quickly, making it difficult to understand important concepts.”
MATH200
“ an A, you just need to stay consistent and .”
MATH200

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online MATH251 reviews , and weak explanations.

Main concern

Outdated or wrong .

What students said

“Her lectures consist of outdated, full of errors, and poorly formulated videos.”
MATH251
“If you don't write out every single step you took, you will probably get a 60%.”
MATH251
“Weird class structure, be ready for 80% in homework because there is something she would NOT like at all times.”
MATH251

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams matter and can feel hard, with occasional note use, but reviews .

Test heavySome note-allowed testsPop quizzesHomework-weighted

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews call tests hard or ; pop quizzes appear in tags.

Test heavyPop quizzesHarsh deductions
“ but I didn't study much so .”
MATH225
“ , and asking questions was intimidating.”
MATH200

Online

Online evidence mentions note-allowed tests and .

Notes allowed on testsHomework-heavy gradingConfusing videos
“ and so it kind of balances out.”
MATH251
“ , and .”
MA251

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you care about your GPA.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, weighting , and grading while noting minority positives. Credibility rating: High.

⚡

30/100

“The professor teaches at an extremely fast pace, making it difficult to understand the material clearly.”

📚

18/100

“There is an overwhelming amount of homework, and the .”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

32/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and
  • she is very impatient when you ask her questions
  • She's not the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and unclear
  • If you don't write out every single step you took, you will probably get a 60%
  • an A

Theme 3

💻 About Course Content

  • your grade depends more on being able to understand coding than statistics
  • basically just copy and paste it into your own program
  • all we see is her T posing every 10 minutes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

115

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews with long time span and repeated themes of , and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 540
4 out of 511
3 out of 57
2 out of 57
1 out of 551

Course coverage

MATH20021 reviews
MATH2516 reviews
MA2515 reviews
MATH1104 reviews
MATH1204 reviews
Show 7 more courses
40680MATH8112 reviews
MATH1302 reviews
MATH2252 reviews
8111 review
MATH1101201 review
MATH2521 review
MATH8111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

22

A+ 9 · A 9 · A- 4

B range

19

B+ 4 · B 6 · B- 9

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1