AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Tony Viertel

Courses not reported · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

if you , and accept a hard, low-flexibility accounting pace.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderTest HeavyNo Late WorkHigh Self-Discipline NeededDiscouraging Tone
  • Accounting courses move fast and .
  • Grading is strict with no and .
  • One student thrived with office help and tutors, but most call the experience harsh or unclear.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

24/100

Reported grades skew low and success requires constant prep with no cushion.

Both formats show tough outcomes; the sole upbeat online student still earned a D+.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

, and test-focused structure make the content feel hard for average students.

In-person stresses pace and focus; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory across reviews with no real flexibility signals.

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Only one explicit take-again yes among mostly negative or cautionary reviews.

The positive recommendation is online; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

, and low reported grades dominate.

Format shift

In-person details the rigid policies; .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of reading and heavy load.

Format shift

Online and and .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

A and willingness to answer questions, but and discouraging delivery.

Format shift

One online review is strongly positive on support; in-person reviews are mostly critical.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Comments emphasize tests, limited graded items, and prep discipline more than projects.

Format shift

Both formats tag test heavy; in-person adds graded-by-few-things.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and sometimes demoralizing, with , and a defensive classroom tone.

Main concern

No late , and comments about putting students down.

What students said

“no ”
98010
“He has a habit of putting students down instead of uplifting us”
98010
“by far the ”
91431

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, but instruction clarity is mixed; one student thrived with recorded lectures and Zooms, another dropped.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“The online classes had the same in person lecture.1-11 zooms are helpful!”
91431
“Beautiful design of the canvas page. . .”
98010

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and weak review habits reported.

Test HeavyNo Extra CreditChapter ExamsLittle Pre-Exam Review

Assessment risk

Strict

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; students say he advances to new chapters instead of reviewing.

Test HeavyNo Extra CreditWeak Exam Review
“He goes over a new chapter before an is on”
98010
“no ”
98010

Online

Online evidence but stresses tough testing and .

Test HeavyTough Grading
“ . .”
98010

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“by far the ”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (2 online, 3 in person), highlighting rigor and support gaps. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

36/100

“ . .”

🚫 Recommendation

28/100

“by far the ”

⚖️

22/100

“no ”

📚 Self-Discipline Required

30/100

“you must read and and have self discipline”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Defensive on a regular basis
  • putting students down instead of uplifting us

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Test heavy
  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

🛠️ About Succeeding Anyway

  • reach to him for help and meet up with the accounting tutor
  • 1-11 zooms are helpful
  • My grade was my lack of using resources/slacking

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 reviews with mixed detail and a short span; direction is consistent but sample size is limited.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

914313 reviews
980102 reviews

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1