AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Chuck Cecil

ANTH360 · ANTH150 · ANTH127 · ANTH125 · ANTH155 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you learn well from textbooks alone and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProStory heavy lecturesSelf taught testingNo study guidesMandatory attendance labsTextbook dependent
  • Lectures often become personal field stories instead of .
  • or online grade updates.
  • but feel dull and strictly monitored.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

if you complete workbooks, but and several students report tough grading.

All evidence is in person; lab courses read easier than ANTH125 and ANTH150 lecture sections.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard intro anthropology difficulty, .

Evidence is only in person across labs and lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Many reviews say attendance is mandatory, with strict absence rules in labs.

All comments are in person; several stress come every class or you are out.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

; fans like his stories while others urge you to stay away.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

Some call lab grading fair at semester end; others label him a .

Format shift

In-person only; .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly workbook pages and textbook reading are steady but usually not overwhelming.

Format shift

; lectures emphasize reading and tests.

Teaching experience

Average

38/100

Knowledgeable and story-rich, yet many say he does not teach toward exams and leaves learning self-directed.

Format shift

All reviews in person show the .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Lecture grades hinge on quizzes and multipage scantron tests; .

Format shift

In person only; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

passion and field stories impress some, but many struggle with , and rigid labs.

Main concern

Hard to know and grades often appear late.

What students said

“50% of the lectures were off-topic personal stories.”
ANTH125
“when it comes to the ”
ANTH125
“You never know where you stand in the course until the very end”
ANTH150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

with little guidance and delayed grade posting.

Multiple choice examsNo study guidesTextbook basedUnannounced tests reported

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and sometimes feel unannounced; labs use worksheets and short quizzes.

No study guidesMultiple choice scantronRead the textbookUnannounced tests
“No study guide for the exams, but they're all multiple choice”
ANTH125
“All he says is read the book.”
ANTH125
“ .”
ANTH150

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not the worse professor but definitely someone you wanna stay away from. His classes them self aren't bad, its the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 in-person anthropology reviews , and lab structure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“much of the class is self taught. You're basically on your own for studying”

📚

35/100

“he gives us no study guides, nor really any tools or resources on what to prepare for.”

👍 Recommendation Split

42/100

“ his courses.”

🧪 Lab Reality

55/100

“For . Instead, we spent the time filling out worksheets from a textbook”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • 50% of the lectures were off-topic personal stories
  • teaches through his real life experience
  • 1 lecture for the whole semester

Theme 2

📈

  • no study guides
  • You never know where you stand in the course until the very end
  • summaries and vocab

Theme 3

📋 About Labs

  • complete 10-15 pages of pages out of the workbook's weekly chapter
  • DO NOT share answers with each other
  • 2 absences and your OUT

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen consistent in-person reviews over several years show a stable pattern of , though sample size is moderate.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ANTH1275 reviews
ANTH1254 reviews
ANTH1503 reviews
ANTH1551 review
ANTH3601 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Audit/No Grade 2 · Not sure yet 4