AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Yelena Feinman

MATH220 · MATH200 · MATH115 · MATH122 · MATH130 · MATH210 · MATH251 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
24%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material well and and high-stakes tests.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understand accentTest heavyLots of homeworkTough graderSelf-teach online
  • Most students struggle with a , and .
  • and proctored high-weight exams.
  • A , and passable with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible but requires constant homework and .

Online students emphasize weekend exams and busywork; in and drops.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Material and testing are hard for most, with many citing confusion, heavy HW, and difficult exams.

Both formats rate content hard; online adds self-teaching burden.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Online is often asynchronous or non-mandatory, while in .

Online more flexible; in .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

About one in ; most warn about accent, workload, and unhelpful support.

A , but the majority of both formats say no.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough grader tags dominate; final and , and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Weekly or , and frequent tests create a heavy load.

Format shift

Online adds weekend quizzes; in person adds pop quizzes and note-heavy lectures.

Teaching experience

Poor

26/100

Students mostly cannot understand the accent or explanations; a few praise care and office-hour help.

Format shift

In person accent issues dominate; online self-teaching complaints dominate.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tests and supporting them.

Format shift

Online final often ~35% with proctored testing; in person multiple tests and pop quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person reviews stress accent comprehension , and little .

Main concern

Cannot understand lectures and feel brushed off when asking questions.

What students said

“can't really understand her accent at all. because ”
MATH200
“Just writes and because its "easy" and expects you to know it already.”
MATH251

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online is often lecture-light with daily homework, weekend timed quizzes, and .

Main concern

and slow or .

What students said

“ and and you have to type in the answers/equations.”
MATH200
“The online MATH200 class did not have lectures at all. We had to read the textbook and .”
MATH200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes, often proctored and restrictive, with limited student-friendly flexibility.

Proctored examsNo calculatorNo scratch paperWeekend timed quizzesHigh final weight

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person students report hard tests that diverge from study guides plus pop quizzes and .

Test heavyPop quizzesHard tests vs study guides
“ if you dont study.”
MATH200
“Study guides for tests are basic concepts while the wasn't covered.”
MATH130

Online

and scratch paper, and can occupy whole weekends.

Proctored testsNo calculatorNo scratch paperSaturday and Sunday quizzes
“Every month you have an and so your whole weekend is taken up.”
MATH200
“ and its a big part of your grade”
MATH200

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is the . Tons of HW. Final exam counts for 35% of your score, and your grade could drop from an A to a C or even lower.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews (16 online, 12 in person), highlighting accent barriers, heavy testing, and rare positive outliers. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

26/100

“She is not a good teacher at all. Just writes and because its "easy" and expects you to know it already.”

📚 Workload Pain

22/100

“Tons of busy work and HW due weekly.”

📝

30/100

“ and its a big part of your grade”

👎 Recommendation

24/100

“ if you don't understand the materials she's teaching.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • hard to understand and she doesn't care for your questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Final exam counts for 35% of your score
  • if you miss a
  • if you care about getting an A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support

  • when she does, the
  • she brushes you off
  • She will even work around your schedule to give you extra help if you're struggling.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

28 detailed reviews across online and in person with highly consistent complaints about accent, workload, and exams.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 519

Course coverage

MATH20016 reviews
MATH1157 reviews
MATH1221 review
MATH1301 review
MATH2101 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH2201 review
MATH2511 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 3