AI Rate Professor

Education

Tina (Jacinda) Watts

PSYC201 · ECE211 · ECE333 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
7.14%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other ECE option and and harsh writing standards.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderSlow to gradePoor communicationHeavy writing loadUnclear Canvas workflow
  • Almost all , and weak communication.
  • and high writing or discussion standards.
  • One older positive note exists, but recent students largely advise avoiding her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Even careful work often gets low scores; resubmits help a little but A paths .

All evidence is online.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Heavy writing, high-quality discussion expectations, and .

All evidence is online.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

on physical attendance.

All evidence is online; in-person evidence is unavailable.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Nearly all students say and communication failures.

All evidence is online; only .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

students feel they followed directions.

Format shift

Online only.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of , and group work with short turnarounds after late posts.

Format shift

Online only.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students describe poor communication, Canvas mistakes, and little .

Format shift

Online only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and few assessment categories.

Format shift

Online only; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All reviews are online ECE and psych , and communication problems.

Main concern

, and unclear high-standard feedback.

What students said

“For and modules SATURDAY and .”
ECE211
“It takes months for an .”
ECE333

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam proctoring policies; and discussions.

Assignment-heavy gradingDiscussion postsWriting observations

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online evidence focuses on assignment and .

Written assignmentsDiscussion postsLate grading
“She wants to have a and .”
ECE333
“She takes too ”
ECE333

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . she is an ”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 , and near-universal avoid advice. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“isn't a teacher for the students (which makes me sad because this is an ECE class)”

🐢

18/100

“watts is a . because I did everything accordingly, but still received pretty blah grades.”

🐢 Communication Fail

15/100

“she ... asked for her help so many times and she just blew it off..”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“I would not take any of her classes in the future.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and expects a lot
  • Gives low score grades
  • It takes months for an .

Theme 2

🛠️ About Course Ops

  • and modules SATURDAY and
  • had many mistakes in
  • on campus

Theme 3

💬 Rare Positive Note

  • Professor Watts is also willing to help you with
  • even though you do learn a lot in this class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

14 consistently negative online reviews with , but smaller sample and .

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ECE3339 reviews
ECE2113 reviews
PSYC2012 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3