AI Rate Professor

Science

Maryam Khan

PHYS250 · ENGR100 · ENGR230 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Solid for some engineering courses if you self-study; if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringAccessible Outside ClassTest HeavyUnclear LecturesExtra Credit
  • ENGR students often find her caring with and flexible deadlines.
  • PHYS250 reviews call lectures weak and .
  • Communication can fail online when Zooms are missed and emails lag.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some ENGR students earn A/A+ with study and ; and unforgiving.

Online ENGR reports high grades despite support issues; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Statics and physics expect prior calc and physics knowledge; lectures do not always carry weak students.

ENGR100 online/in person easier than PHYS250 in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and optional in others; skip-class risk is noted for harder courses.

Mixed signals across online and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Roughly half would take again; .

Online ENGR mixed; in-person ENGR better than PHYS250.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and , but tough grader and hard exams appear often.

Format shift

ENGR more flexible; PHYS tougher.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly assignments and labs for ENGR; lots of homework and test prep for PHYS.

Format shift

Both formats expect steady weekly work.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Caring and accessible for many, yet repeatedly called a weak physics lecturer.

Format shift

Online communication issues; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Homework and labs matter, but and .

Format shift

ENGR and PHYS both test heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person ENGR can feel laid back with ; PHYS250 draws hard tests and poor lecture complaints.

Main concern

Physics lectures and .

What students said

“Not strict with if you need to”
ENGR100
“Not a good lecturer and and unorganized.”
PHYS250
“Professor Maryam is patient & kind.”
ENGR230

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ENGR100 split: one A+ with , and missing lab videos.

Main concern

Hard to reach and missing live sessions or lab support.

What students said

“she never showed up for the introductory zoom call or the 1st day followup zoom call, never answered emails or texts”
ENGR100
“Easy to understand her lecture. Attend the class regularly, and follow the lessons carefully”
ENGR100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams can be hard and sometimes disorganized, with and .

Hard ExamsTake-Home MakeupFormula SheetWebAssign HWExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person physics tests can be unprepared; one class got a .

Hard In-Person TestsTake-Home MakeupFormula SheetExtra Credit
“ and unorganized.”
PHYS250
“she was lenient enough to give us a .”
PHYS250
“She gives .”
ENGR230

Online

Online comments focus on labs and weekly ; .

Weekly AssignmentsLabs
“never did end up posting the videos we needed for the lab.”
ENGR100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not a good lecturer and and unorganized.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (2 online, 7 in person), highlighting ENGR vs PHYS experience splits. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Very charismatic but a horrible lecturer.”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“Loved her Statics class. I got an A-.”

📬 Accessibility Issues

40/100

“never answered emails or texts, only way to get in contact is to make an appointment that is always 2 days out.”

❤️ Caring Side

70/100

“I think Professor Khan is a very caring professor, and is often empathetic to her students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Easy to understand her lecture
  • horrible lecturer
  • patient & kind

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but as long as you study and try

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Accessible outside class
  • Caring
  • never showed up for the introductory zoom call

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine mixed reviews across ENGR and PHYS with clear course-level split but modest sample size.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGR1004 reviews
PHYS2504 reviews
ENGR2301 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1