AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Miranda Wang

MATH120 · MATH200 · STATC1000 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
64.29%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take her if you will attend, keep up with coding labs, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPresentation-based gradingCoding and labs heavyPicky graderGroup work focusedAttendance matters
  • Many , and midterm or .
  • Attendance and .
  • Students split between sweet supportive mentor and picky or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

High grades are common if and presentations well, but and heavy work keep it from being a free A.

; online notes mainly confirm resubmits and presentation weight.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Stats and coding concepts plus long theory videos make the content moderately challenging rather than introductory fluff.

Evidence is mostly in person; online MATH200 still centers labs and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Most reviews say attend every day, and pop quizzes or in-class work cannot always be made up.

; one online MATH200 review said attendance was not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and clarity when you engage, while others found her unorganized or picky.

In-person opinions are mixed-positive; online is split between one strong yes and one strong no.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Revisions and , but tough or .

Format shift

In-person students mention picky details most; one online review praises resubmitting for a better grade.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Labs, handwritten video notes, group work, and .

Format shift

Heavy-work comments come mainly from in-person MATH200; .

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

Many call her caring and , but others cite unorganization, boring lectures, or weak communication.

Format shift

In-person reviews drive this blend; online sample is too small and split to change the overall picture.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Labs and and limited traditional tests.

Format shift

Both formats describe presentation midterms or finals plus labs; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In and group coding work with , and required attendance.

Main concern

, and missed assignment communication can hurt grades.

What students said

“CODING is majority of the course which can be hard at first, but easy to pick up.”
MATH200
“she and will call you out on very minor details.”
MATH200

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Limited online notes show lab-code focus, Zoom presentations, resubmits allowed, and one strong negative math120 experience.

Main concern

Very few online reviews, including one student who felt the class showed movies instead of teaching math.

What students said

“We only had two major presentations via Zoom, one as a midterm and one as .”
MATH200
“Instead, she began to show us a crazy movie. I did not learn anything!”
MATH120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment often uses presentations and students find manageable if prepared.

Presentation midterm and finalLab coding weightIn-class quizzesResubmits allowed

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections often replace classic tests with coding presentations, labs, and .

Presentation midterm and finalLabs and codingIn-class quizzes
“Midterm and .”
MATH200
“Class is heavily dependent on the midterm and .”
STATC1000

Online

Online MATH200 used Zoom midterm and allowed.

Zoom presentationsLab code assignmentsResubmits
“We only had two major presentations via Zoom, one as a midterm and one as .”
MATH200

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Attend the class, participate, and do the . You will be fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews with Medium credibility, emphasizing MATH200 labs, presentations, and mixed instructor tone.

🎯

72/100

“Midterm and .”

📝

34/100

“she dumps a ton of .”

❤️ Caring Side

70/100

“She's super sweet and nice to her students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are annoying but are bearable.
  • . she loves making jokes
  • and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Not a hard class as long as .
  • she and will call you out on very minor details
  • You will do well if you try.

Theme 3

💻 About Course Format

  • CODING is majority of the course
  • She also allows resubmitting work for a better grade!
  • Instead, she began to show us a crazy movie.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews give a usable picture of MATH200 patterns, but limited online data and mixed tone keep credibility medium.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH20010 reviews
MATH1203 reviews
STATC10001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1