AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Kei-Lee Liu

CHEM410 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; students report rude interactions and having to teach themselves the entire course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMean and AggressiveDisorganized ModulesSelf-Taught OnlyPoor CommunicationAvoid If Possible
  • Students describe her as mean, aggressive, and impolite when they ask questions.
  • Online hybrid lectures were random YouTube and Khan Academy videos with .
  • Both reviews rate quality 1 and difficulty 5 and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Difficulty is rated max and reviews give no path to a fair A .

Both online and evidence.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Content is treated as very hard and students say they had to teach it to themselves.

Online and in-person both rate difficulty 5 with no beginner-friendly comments.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; the online hybrid review says it was not.

In-person listed mandatory yes; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Both reviews slam quality at 1 and .

Negative recommendation tone is consistent across online and in-person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

No lenient-grade comments; only max difficulty and .

Format shift

Neither format mentions curves, , or .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Self-teaching a hard chem course implies heavy student load with little guided structure.

Format shift

Online review stresses teaching yourself; .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students report aggression in person and .

Format shift

In-person pain is interpersonal tone; online pain is zero real teaching.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

Neither format details how grades were calculated.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Students say she invites questions but reacts mean and aggressive, raising her voice in front of others.

Main concern

Impolite, aggressive classroom tone and frequent student complaints.

What students said

“when you do she is always really mean and aggressive”
CHEM410

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Hybrid summer chem with , and almost no real teaching.

Main concern

You must teach yourself the material with poor communication and no structure.

What students said

“Entire class had to teach ourselves the material. Awful experience, and if you can.”
CHEM410

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Online

Online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Awful experience, and if you can.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting hostility and self-teaching failure. Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Quality Collapse

10/100

“Her "lectures" consisted of random youtube and khan academy videos that she expects you to sort through.”

🚫

5/100

“Awful experience, and if you can.”

😠 Hostile Classroom Tone

15/100

“she is always really mean and aggressive”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • random youtube and khan academy videos
  • Entire class had to teach ourselves the material

Theme 2

😠 About Interaction

  • always really mean and aggressive
  • impolite to talk with students
  • A lot students complains about her all the time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two recent detailed negative reviews agree strongly, but the sample is too small for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM4102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values