AI Rate Professor

History

Jimmy Wong

HIST101 · HIS101 · HIS201 · HIST104 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

Avoid this professor; students across online and college.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderNo second chancesAnnouncement chaosTest heavyUnresponsive
  • Every review is 1/5 quality with
  • Harsh late and format penalties make grades feel unforgiving
  • Communication and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

Students report minute-late , and grades like F, Incomplete, and C+ with zero grace.

Both online and chances.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

, and unforgiving policies make the course feel punishing.

Difficulty is rated very high in both formats.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

70/100

, but missing work or deadlines still destroys the grade.

Online and while remaining unforgiving on submissions.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

All quality scores are 1 and every explicit take-again answer is no, with .

and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

; late work, format errors, and tech issues all lead to failure with no exceptions.

Format shift

Harshness is consistent online and in person.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Not many traditional homework sets, but reading, quizzes, tests, and a .

Format shift

Online stresses sparse graded items and a ; and quiz heavy.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students call him noncaring, rude, off-topic, inaccessible, and the .

Format shift

Online students feel abandoned; in-person students say he rambles and ignores student concerns.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Assessment is mostly multiple-choice tests, pop quizzes, and a .

Format shift

Online emphasizes MC tests and a ; and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

as , and filled with high-stakes quizzes and no second chances.

Main concern

, and no exceptions when something goes wrong.

What students said

“ !!!!!!”
HIS101
“ , and doesn't accept any exceptions with tests.”
HIS101
“NEVER POSTS GRADES ONLINE! Only . AVOID!”
HIST104

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections bury work in announcements, punish tiny format or lateness errors, and and condescending.

Main concern

Easy-to-miss announcements and zero grace on late or misformatted submissions.

What students said

“For his online course he sends "regular" assignments in announcements and .”
HIS201
“Are you turning in ? It's a failure!”
HIS101
“ , while also being unreasonably strict with and submission criteria.”
HIST101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and ; open notes appear only as a rare upside.

Multiple choice testsPop quizzesStrict submission formatOpen note testsNo late work

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop-quiz heavy with no exceptions; one review notes open-note tests as the only upside.

Pop quizzesTest heavyOpen note testsNo exceptions
“has the , and doesn't give any students a second chance.”
HIS101
“Only . AVOID!”
HIST104

Online

Online graded work is mostly MC tests plus a 32-slide PowerPoint final; wrong format or lateness means failure.

Multiple choice tests32-slide PowerPoint finalNo late workStrict submission format
“ . The final is a 32 slide powerpoint. If the submission format is wrong he will fail you.”
HIS201
“Your internet connection failed during the midterm, and you had no chance of taking the midterm.”
HIS101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The !!No excuses, no chances! Are you turning in ? It's a failure!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting harsh grading, poor communication, and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Disaster

8/100

“Would never take this class .”

🪓

8/100

“If the submission format is wrong he will fail you. No exceptions for late work.”

📭 No Support

5/100

“ , while also being unreasonably strict with and submission criteria.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • !!!!!!
  • just rambles in class. Always off topic, talking about random stuff.
  • He was very rude to the class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Are you turning in ? It's a failure!
  • , and doesn't accept any exceptions with tests.
  • NEVER POSTS GRADES ONLINE!

Theme 3

🗂️ About Organization & Access

  • and not assignment tab easy to miss.
  • Forget emailing him, unless you want a condescending response.
  • He doesn't use modules in .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seven unanimous 1-star reviews from 2021-2023 with and communication give high confidence.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

HIS1014 reviews
HIS2011 review
HIST1011 review
HIST1041 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1